HFCS, sugar, diabetics, and human microbiome

http://neoneocon.com/2012/03/21/the-case-of-sugar-v-corn-syrup/

One commenter wrote something funny on the side of HFCS=natural sugar.

Ymar doesn’t know what he does not know.

…

BTW, Ymar, scientists in aggregate understand a tremendous amount about the human body. It is regrettable that Ymar has put on his nihilist, know-nothing hat. He is simply unable to comprehend Occam’s micro-lecture.

Occam is blessedly 100% right-again, as always-and always lucid, which I am not.-DC

Here comes a scientist to defend the flock. But such things are not my concern and were never going to propel human progress a single step forward. It’s simply tribal loyalty. Of what worth is that to me?-Ymar

Looks like something they didn’t know was the microbiome.

The thing about real science is that it doesn’t have blinders on like Global Warming cultists do. But there’s a lot of Doctor Class and award specialists like DC there that think they are privileged to better information and thinking than the rest of us. Turns out the opposite is true if anything else.

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2014/08/28/microbiome-gut-health.aspx

Chemically, they said processed and artificially made HFCS is the same as natural sugar or the molecular chain sucrose. That there was no difference, essentially, between 50/50 fructuse and sucrose, and pure sucrose. Essentially, natural sugars and fruit juices should have the same effect on the human body’s health as artificial sugars and juices. Yet the human body can tell the difference and doesn’t run on artificial junk as well, just as diesel engines don’t want to run on gasoline and gasoline engines don’t like diesel, although technically it should work for both. It’ll work but it’ll break down in time faster.

http://news.therawfoodworld.com/artificial-sweeteners-muck-gut-lower-human-microbiome/

As someone that does real scientific experiments, I refused to make wild claims about microbiome being destroyed by HFCS back then. There wasn’t proof yet. Big difference between how doctors and scientists operate these days.

Nor are the new “studies” the new dogma of the land, they’re merely new data. Might not be fully accurate either. The only ones I am certain of are experimental data from experiments I conduct or analyze. I can know those aren’t contaminated to a high degree of accuracy. What the Ruling Class chooses to fund in terms of experiments? Can’t really trust those.

<B>

All three sugars – sucrose, glucsose, and fructose – are crystalline solids when pure.-Occam’s Razor

And that is also why a car engine runs the same on premium, diesel, and non leaded plus. Thus there’s no real difference. After all, they’re just the same liquid when pure. More or less, right.

Actually there is a significant difference. The human body is a lot more complicated and is a more accurate reader of reality than the human eye. Or mind. Or a car engine for that matter.

Things are not as simple as they seem on the surface. Not with politics. Not with petrol. Not with bio-chemistry.</b>

What I wrote back then, applies the same, for it is the same basic perspective I view many things.

Explore posts in the same categories: Science