Archive for the ‘Science’ category

The Power of the Gods

April 23, 2018

Notice how “gravity” doesn’t even exist in this context, especially since it is not a unified force in Physics.

Also notice how sapphire, a rock, is used as a power transmission system. There’s a reason why people said the ancient pyramids were power generators. This relates to the Ark of the Covenant as well.

When the scientific consensus dies off, when Newton/Einstein dies off, when the students of Newton/Einstein dies of, then humanity can obtain individual breakthroughs in progress.


Earth Marbles are photoshopped

April 16, 2018

Scientific Consensus: wrong

April 11, 2018

Space X Antics

April 2, 2018

Another rather funny compilation about why the world is not a sphere.

Billy Graham’s death

February 24, 2018

Billy Graham and Charles Templeton In Dialogue
Here is an excerpt from that book, about a pivotal conversation he had with Billy Graham as he was leaving the faith. The context is his desire to go to Princeton to study the Christian faith more critically. He wanted Graham to come with him. Please keep in mind, this is his account of the conversation:

“All our differences came to a head in a discussion which, better than anything I know, explains Billy Graham and his phenomenal success as an evangelist.

In the course of our conversation I said, ‘But, Billy, it’s simply not possible any longer to believe, for instance, the biblical account of creation. The world was not created over a period of days a few thousand years ago; it has evolved over millions of years. It’s not a matter of speculation; it’s a demonstrable fact.’

‘I don’t accept that’ Billy said. ‘And there are reputable scholars who don’t.’

‘Who are these scholars?’ I said. ‘Men in conservative Christian colleges[?]’

[Tweet “I believe the Genesis account of creation because it’s in the Bible. “]

‘Most of them, yes,’ he said. ‘But that is not the point. I believe the Genesis account of creation because it’s in the Bible. I’ve discovered something in my ministry: When I take the Bible literally, when I proclaim it as the word of God, my preaching has power. When I stand on the platform and say, ‘God says,’ or ‘The Bible says,’ the Holy Spirit uses me. There are results. Wiser men than you or I have been arguing questions like this for centuries. I don’t have the time or the intellect to examine all sides of the theological dispute, so I’ve decided once for all to stop questioning and accept the Bible as God’s word.’

‘But Billy,’ I protested, ‘You cannot do that. You don’t dare stop thinking about the most important question in life. Do it and you begin to die. It’s intellectual suicide.’”

‘I don’t know about anybody else,’ he said, ‘but I’ve decided that that’s the path for me.’”

(Farewell to God, 7-8)

For me, this represents one of the saddest encounters two people have ever had. It recounts a decisive breach in the friendship between two men as one left Christ, never to come back, and the other went on to, in my opinion, change the world.

I was looking up the background of the Florida school shooting, where three JROTC fatalities were recognized for their valor or actions. I had an interesting insight that religion, specifically one type, had to do with them, so went looking for their backgrounds. After I found it, I saw an article that Billy Graham had died. Which led me to remember that there was another evangelist, Templeton that recanted his belief in his religion, since he had some secular/intellectual doubts.

I was reminded of something else during a debate topic about Occam’s Razor’s proper usage.

In the philosophy of religion, Occam’s razor is sometimes applied to the existence of God. William of Ockham himself was a Christian. He believed in God, and in the authority of Scripture; he writes that “nothing ought to be posited without a reason given, unless it is self-evident (literally, known through itself) or known by experience or proved by the authority of Sacred Scripture.”[53] Ockham believed that an explanation has no sufficient basis in reality when it does not harmonize with reason, experience, or the Bible. However, unlike many theologians of his time, Ockham did not believe God could be logically proven with arguments. To Ockham, science was a matter of discovery, but theology was a matter of revelation and faith. He states: “only faith gives us access to theological truths. The ways of God are not open to reason, for God has freely chosen to create a world and establish a way of salvation within it apart from any necessary laws that human logic or rationality can uncover.”Infogalactic

Since I have received personal divine revelations, I can understand why divine truths are often incompatible with human logic and knowledge.

How is anything a demonstrable fact when nobody has demonstrated time travel to us? Wouldn’t one have to utilize time travel or create a facsimile of the Earth, before one can declare that millions of years of random X gravity produced it…

The point is, the Jesuit liberation theology and knowledge vs knowledge format of liberal arts education, has a crucial contradiction inside of it. It hinges upon epistemology: how does one know what one knows.

Now has become a popular time, due to the internet, of reanalyzing exactly what we knew and when we knew it. As a result, some interesting things have popped out.

The Sun-Moon-Earth system is an impossibility given the Three Body Problem. For those with a sufficiently high math IQ, they may be able to comprehend what that means just by that sentence alone. We have general and specific solutions for springs, bullets, bridges collapsing, etc. We don’t have one for a stable three body system, which is why it is called a problem. Specific solutions exist, but they look like infinity figure eights… Our solar system is also far larger than a three body problem. It’s like a n+2 body problem.

We can’t even produce a gravimetric model of a three body system, let alone a 9 body solar system with modern engineering and computer models. So what is gravity exactly and why is it inconsistent with the 3 other forces in physics?

Socratic questions breaks the limit of human wisdom.

Oh yea, about the speed of light that was supposed to be a constant. Atomic clocks have measured a decrease in the speed of light. So what happens to the theory of relativity when one of its constants is not a constant? Certainly, “demonstrate” these facts for us, if it can be done. So far, the Earth’s core is shown as a fact to us, but have they demonstrated this by drilling down to the mantle? Nope. Around 10 miles is the max we have ever drilled, but the authorities tell us that it is a “demonstrable fact” that they know what is going on with the Earth now and millions of years ago…

They haven’t demonstrated anything except intellectual arrogance. It would be the same as doctors saying they know what is going on in the human body before the age of MRIs. The usual counter is that they know because they use earthquakes to monitor the inside of the Earth. Oh really, that’s like doctors claiming they know what brain wavelengths affect which neurotransmitters, by hitting the knee with a steel hammer to create a resonance.

It’s not a demonstrable fact that humans know anything about what has been going on here. Case in point, Pyramid of Giza, utilizing technology far beyond 1900 USA. Carving out ten thousand + ton stone blocks using slaves and hand tools is their current theory. Well, we tried drilling holes in these megalithic granite crystalline structures. Our drill bits destroyed themselves, whether diamond or not. There goes that theory of “demonstrable facts”. Our drills destroyed themselves, so how did the ancients drill fine holes through these megalith structures that we could not do using 21st century tech?

There is still a lot more things to discover, Charles Templeton. And you’ll figure that out on the other side of the veil even if you didn’t on this side.

The Super moon with once in a blue moon blood moon

January 21, 2018

To summarize, there were or will be 3 full moons between 2017 and 2018 January that are considered supermoons, 14% larger and 30% brighter. January is once in a blue moon, since it has 2 full moon periods in one month.

Now this ties in with a little Alt Earth research concerning the light of the moon producing temperature variations on objects at night incompatible with the model that the sun is shining light on the moon. The thermal radiation signatures would make the temperature of objects in moon light rise or at least stay equivalent to ambient. Instead, some tests show that moon light cools or negatively affects the energy of matter, living or otherwise. I noticed a potential correlation between various data points because this month of January in 2018, was quite cold by more than 20-30 degrees Fahrenheit at times for our locale. And for the rest of the USA, the situation is comparable at least.

Why is there a cold period just as 3 supermoons are rising? The data points presents an extended, but very short window in which to contrast data points, allowing more accurate points to be assessed and analyzed. This is different from specific experimental dealing with the temperature of water under moonlight. Another experimental variation might be that moonlight has more effect on human and living water systems with their own electromagnetic field, than inanimate rocks and dead matter. There’s always been crime statistic rumors that more fights and brawls happen on full moons.

If moonlight produces temperature dips into the negative of ambient, then the moon getting closer and brighter would necessarily produce a greater temperature variation.

The full blood moon is a moon that is behind the Earth as the sun is on the other side. How this doesn’t produce a new moon of total blackness, I have no idea. The idea that the moon is red because of the earth’s shadow, makes less sense once the periods in which the sun and the moon are in the sky at the same time, morning or evening, are accounted for. A crescent moon should not be possible given the three body problem of the sun, Earth, and moon system. If the moon and sun are in the same sky, then that means they are within 180 degrees of the Earth and the moon should obtain at least half full status due to the sunlight. Celestial mechanics were hard to visualize, probably because mathematically it doesn’t work. There is no calculus equation for a three body problem, because the system or the function is something we humans cannot construct. Yet celestial mechanics is described as a three body problem in which we can predict, but only because we are given the answers in the sky.

Can we really understand and predict the celestial mechanics, of systems with greater than 3 bodies? Even 3 bodies is producing the Three Body Problem. If the orthodox status quo science is correct, then we have already solved the three body problem since we have fully described the sun, moon, earth system. However, if that is not true, then there are hidden mysteries still left for humanity to dig up.

Kubrick and Apollo missions

December 2, 2017

The link itself concerns the photographic analysis of Kubrick filming methods vs Apollo filming methods. Below is my response to the timeline of Apollo, Operation Fishbowl, Operation High Jump, Operation Deep Freeze, Admiral Byrd’s missions to Arctic and Antarctica, and Operation Paperclip that led to NASA.

This is so much like Three Body Problem by that chinese author. No wonder the Chinese made it popular. It linked to so many NASA conspiracy facts.

The USA and Soviets needed a WallFacer. A solution to present to the ETs, that the ETs couldn’t spy on. So they pretended those ICBMs were against each other, and layered national security over national security secrets, knowing UFOs were watching them. Those ICBMs weren’t meant to irradiate the planet (they weren’t worried about that lobbing nukes at the sky). They were meant for an alien invasion.

They may have gone in contact with ETs from a gate at Area 51 (opened by Aleister Crowley’s faction), but they fell for the lie. So they’re just killing people for national security, even though they don’t know who is manipulating whom here. ETs may have said “oh, we’re here to help you, we didn’t build the dome, that was the hostile aliens”. Yeah, right. Believe as much of that as you wish.

No wonder there are secret black ops in the US that don’t even receive Congressional funding. That way they don’t even have to tell the US President anything.

Here’s a fanmade video of the Three Body Problem’s encounter with an ET entity called the “waterdrop“. It is easier to summarize the kind of content there than with a “wall” of text from the wikipedia articles.

What do I believe? I believe humans deceive. It is easy to believe in things you fear and things we want to be true. As for me, I utilize parallel processing: entertaining a theory without believing in it.