They translated the Bible incorrectly: again

Posted April 24, 2018 by ymarsakar
Categories: History

This has to do with the famous/infamous line from Jesus of Nazareth: love your enemies as you love yourself. It also includes the greatest commandment of the Old Testament summed up as: you will love your God with all your might, mind, and soul.

So what did they get wrong? They got the word love wrong.

The Greek word used in the New Testament is agape or phileo. Agape is used usually.

The original Hebrew word used in the Old Testament was something akin to Chesed. Chesed needed to be translated into Greek, so they used agape. Greek has 4 words for love. Eros being erotic or romantic/sexual love. Phileo being brotherly love, family love, comradeship (war buddies). Agape being an intellectual or spiritual love, freely chosen, based upon mutual respect. There was no Greek cultural term for Chesed because Greeks at the time had a totally alien culture compared to the Hebrews. So agape was chosen because it was the best fit.

So when secular readers of the Bible notice that the New Testament sounds a lot different than the Old Testament, they are correct. Jesus did not speak of love as we understand it. The Old Testament was not about love either. There is no mismatch there as would be the case for the Old Testament’s wars and executions vs the New Testament’s “love and non violence”.

Translating Eastern languages into Western and vice a versa is very difficult. Hebrew reads from right to left, just like Japanese does. Western languages read from left to right. It is why Japanese mangas read from the right panel to the left panel, then the bottom right panel, then the bottom left panel unlike Korean or Western comics. Japanese has a word for ai uchi, meaning two duelists kill each other in a single strike, ensuring mutual death and destruction. English doesn’t have a term for that, although we can describe it. That is because to the japanese, ai uchi was a skill that people could go for. If you are too weak to kill the enemy without dying, then you can at least take them down with you. We call that a Pyrhhic victory, but to the japanese it is often a good result or an intentional result, not a bad one. So how would you translate these Japanese term into English when English has neither the cultural context nor a word that describes the situation? What word we do have, Pyrhhic victory, is incomplete and has negative, not positive, connotations.

This illustrates some of the very alien differences between languages. When King James’ translators, none of which were given the authority of apostle or prophet, translated the Masoretic Hebrew text into English, they did the best they could, but they were merely human. Putting humans on pedestals is not a good idea for people will fall off it. Now just because part of the Masoretic text was corrupted by the scribes and the King James bible team make unintentonal mistakes, doesn’t mean the entire witness testimony from the Old and New Testaments are invalid. It just means as a mad scientist I should take a look at them and determine for myself what is Truth and what is False. It doesn’t matter if the entire world believes in A or disbelieves in B, I will take a look at them myself. There is no subject that cannot be mastered or proficiency obtained in. It only takes me 100 hours of study in a field to comprehend it enough to explain it to others. 10,000 hours are required for mastery. 1000 hours are required for proficiency: the skill level needed to do it at an amateur or professional level. The gain in knowledge and confidence between 1 hour and 100 hour is several magnitude of folds greater than the skill gained between 1000 hours and 5000 hours. It is a logarithmic curve that decreases exponentially as a person becomes more and more specialized in a field.

So what did Jesus ultimately mean when he said you must hate your father and mother before you become a disciple of Jesus? What did Jesus ultimately mean when he said you must love your enemies or your god?

You shall treat your enemies with the same respect and humane treatment as you would treat yourself. If you made a mistake or are responsible for evil, atone for it, thus give your enemies the same chance as you would give yourself. If you can kill yourself, then you can kill your enemies too. Respect for others does not mean treating them special as you would your lover or father or grandfather. The Father in the Heavens, the Father of Jesus, agrees with the existence of free will so that people can decide to love or not love the Father. Forcing someone to love a god at the expense of violating a divine command which is punished with Hell Fire in the Lake of Fire, is not love.

You must love your father and mother less if you wish to follow Jesus of Nazareth. You must love and value your life less, if you wish to follow in the path of a human leader that is going to make the entire world his enemy. If you value wealth, the world, or family more, then do not make the oath of allegiance to that leader, for that leader will become the Enemy of the World. At that time, your mother and father may become your enemies as well. For those that wish to avoid this consequence, do your own thing.

Does this mean The Father and the Son does not love certain humans? If the divine spirits have emotions like humans do, of course they can love and hate. But it was not the Plan of Salvation or War in scripture to make people feel an emotion that they did not, by threatening them with Hellfire. That was something the Vatican and other Religious Control systems created, to glory themselves and their New World Order powers.


The Power of the Gods

Posted April 23, 2018 by ymarsakar
Categories: Science

Notice how “gravity” doesn’t even exist in this context, especially since it is not a unified force in Physics.

Also notice how sapphire, a rock, is used as a power transmission system. There’s a reason why people said the ancient pyramids were power generators. This relates to the Ark of the Covenant as well.

When the scientific consensus dies off, when Newton/Einstein dies off, when the students of Newton/Einstein dies of, then humanity can obtain individual breakthroughs in progress.

Earth Marbles are photoshopped

Posted April 16, 2018 by ymarsakar
Categories: History, Humour, Science

Scientific Consensus: wrong

Posted April 11, 2018 by ymarsakar
Categories: Science

Space X Antics

Posted April 2, 2018 by ymarsakar
Categories: Humour, Science

Another rather funny compilation about why the world is not a sphere.

The FBI’s 9/11 timeline

Posted March 9, 2018 by ymarsakar
Categories: History, Unconventional Warfare

Recent DC fiasco isn’t the first time the FBI have done questionable things.

September 12, 2001: FBI and NTSB Limit Evidence Recovery Efforts at PentagonEdit event
FBI Special Agent John Adams, who is now in charge of evidence recovery at the Pentagon during the daytime, addresses how the FBI should deal with the physical evidence at the crash site. [CREED AND NEWMAN, 2008, PP. 347 AND 351] As the Pentagon is a crime scene, the FBI is responsible for collecting and documenting evidence there. [CREED AND NEWMAN, 2008, PP. 177] Agents are still carefully gathering together wreckage, but there is an overwhelming amount of it to deal with. Several FBI supervisors convene and discuss what the bureau should be recovering. One of them says every airplane part is significant and needs to be treated as valuable evidence. But Adams counters: “That can’t be. We know what happened here. Do we really need to collect every piece of the airplane?” Adams goes over to some National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) crash experts at the site, who are responsible for determining what happened to Flight 77. When he asks them, “Do you guys want pieces of the plane?” an NTSB official responds: “No, it’s clear what happened here. We don’t need pieces of the wings and stuff like that. But we do need the black boxes.” [CREED AND NEWMAN, 2008, PP. 351-352]

Entity Tags: RobertMoomo, Federal Bureau of Investigation, John S. Adams

Timeline Tags: Complete 911 Timeline

Category Tags: 9/11 Investigations, FBI 9/11 Investigation

(September 12, 2001-2002): FBI Intimidates Witnesses Who Saw Atta in Venice; Tells Them to Keep QuietEdit event
A number of witnesses who claim they saw Mohamed Atta living in Venice, Florida in early 2001 later allege that, in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, they are intimidated by the FBI and told to keep quiet about what they knew. Amanda Keller, who claims to have lived with Atta during early 2001 (see (February-April 2001)), later says that, even after she moved away from Venice, FBI agents called her every other day for several months after the attacks. She tells investigative reporter Daniel Hopsicker about “intimidation by the FBI” that she suffered, adding, “They told me not to talk to anybody, to keep my mouth shut.” Stephanie Frederickson, who remembers Keller and Atta living next door to her in the Sandpiper Apartments in Venice, later recalls, “At first, right after the attack, [the FBI] told me I must have been mistaken in my identification. Or they would insinuate that I was lying. Finally they stopped trying to get me to change my story, and just stopped by once a week to make sure I hadn’t been talking to anyone. Who was I going to tell? Most everyone around here already knew.” Charles Grapentine, the manager of the Sandpiper Apartments, also confirms Atta having lived with Keller. He says that, after 9/11, the FBI “called me a liar, and told me to keep my mouth shut.” [HOPSICKER, 2004, PP. 62-63, 65 AND 88-89] According to the FBI’s account of events, Atta had left Venice by late December 2000 or early January 2001. Its account makes no mention of him returning there later. [US CONGRESS, 9/26/2002] A former manager at Huffman Aviation, the Venice flight school attended by Atta in late 2000 (see July 6-December 19, 2000), also later alleges that the FBI intimidated him and told him to keep quiet. He says the FBI was “outside my house four hours after the attack.” He claims his phones were bugged after 9/11, and adds, “I thought these guys [Atta and his associates] were double agents. Why is that so incriminating?” [HOPSICKER, 2004, PP. 149-150]

Entity Tags: Daniel Hopsicker, Charles Grapentine, Mohamed Atta, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Stephanie Frederickson, Amanda Keller

Timeline Tags: Complete 911 Timeline

Category Tags: 9/11 Investigations, FBI 9/11 Investigation

September 12-October 29, 2001: Cars Belonging to 9/11 Hijackers Recovered; Suspicious Powder Found in Car Rented to AttaEdit event
On September 12, the FBI in Miami issues a national bulletin for law enforcement agencies to be on the lookout for two cars connected with the 9/11 attacks. One is a red 1989 Pontiac registered to Mohamed Atta, presumably the car he bought in July 2000 (see Early July 2000). The other is an Oldsmobile Alero, leased from a company in Boca Raton, but this is located later in the day. [WASHINGTON POST, 9/12/2001; WESH 2 (ORLANDO/DAYTONA), 9/12/2001; CNN, 9/13/2001] About six weeks later, the Pontiac and another unspecified car that belonged to Atta and Marwan Alshehhi are found at a used car dealership in Tamarac, Florida, near Fort Lauderdale. The hijackers reportedly sold them a week before 9/11. [CNN, 10/26/2001; CNN, 10/28/2001; MIAMI HERALD, 10/29/2001] Also around this time, Brad Warrick, the owner of a Florida company that rented cars to Atta (see August 6-September 9, 2001), reports finding about a teaspoon of an unidentified white powder in the trunk of a Ford Escort used by Atta in the days before the attacks. The FBI had impounded the car for two weeks after 9/11, and it has not been used since. An FBI spokeswoman says it is unlikely that agents would have missed a suspicious powder and suggests it could be fingerprinting dust. [MIAMI HERALD, 10/29/2001; REUTERS, 10/29/2001; WASHINGTON POST, 10/30/2001]

Entity Tags: Brad Warrick, Mohamed Atta, Federal Bureau of Investigation

Timeline Tags: Complete 911 Timeline

Category Tags: Mohamed Atta, 9/11 Investigations, FBI 9/11 Investigation

September 11, 2001-Autum 2002: FBI’s Saudi Office Fails to Follow Up Thousands of 9/11 Leads; Unprocessed Documents Are DestroyedEdit event
At the time of 9/11, the FBI’s Saudi Arabia office was comprised of only legal attache Wilfred Rattigan and his assistant Gamal Abdel-Hafiz. Abdel-Hafiz, the FBI’s only Muslim agent at the time, had been appointed to the position in February 2001 despite a controversy with his FBI work back in the US (see Early 1999-March 21, 2000). Some fellow FBI agents accused him of refusing to secretly record conversations with Muslim suspects. Time will report, “The FBI sent reinforcements [to the Saudi Arabian office] within two weeks of 9/11, but it appears that the bureau’s team never got on top of the thousands of leads flowing in from the US and Saudi governments.… According to several former employees of the US embassy in Riyadh, the FBI legal attache’s office housed within the embassy was often in disarray during the months that followed 9/11. When an FBI supervisor arrived [nearly a year after 9/11] to clean up the mess, she found a mountain of paper and, for security reasons, ordered wholesale shredding that resulted in the destruction of unprocessed documents relating to the 9/11 investigations.” In June 2005, the Senate Judiciary Committee will begin investigating allegations that the FBI’s Saudi office was “delinquent in pursuing thousands of leads” related to 9/11. Piles of time-sensitive leads still had not been followed up when the supervisor arrives. The FBI will claim that the thousands of shredded documents were duplicated elsewhere. But the Judiciary Committee will assert some material is lost. One employee will claim that some of the lost information “was leads, suspicious-activity material, information on airline pilots.” Rattigan, who has converted to Islam, later will sue the FBI for discrimination and will claim that the FBI refused to provide him with adequate resources to cope with the workload after 9/11. [FRONTLINE, 10/16/2003; TIME, 6/27/2005]

Learn Lethal Force not because of Florida but because of the future Final Battle

Posted February 24, 2018 by ymarsakar
Categories: Traditional Martial Arts, Unconventional Warfare

Rather than dip into the whole fertilized bullsh of what is going on in today’s secure less environment, I’ll just pop down some resources for people who want to get self educated.