How families can protect themselves against internal corruption and external force

Posted July 14, 2015 by ymarsakar
Categories: Culture, Humanity

Families must be restructured to feudal or clan lines if one wishes to promote individual liberty and security from the bottom up.

This habit of relying upon the feds or some outside force to interfere in your own issues, is part of the problem, not the solution. When you don’t defend yourself, the person that has the power to save you, is also your slave master. There’s nothing stopping them, given the power imbalance.

Of course, feudal or clan lines merely requires one thing, a hierarchy, it doesn’t require a change in cultural or social values.

For a prototypical clan head, the male is it, sometimes the female is instead.

The male patriarch handles the hierarchy for the males, the females handle the hierarchy for the females, with some cross over due to age or authority.

Presupposing 3 males, 3 females, we have this structure.

Clan Patriarch 45 years old
Clan heir male 20 years old
Clan second male 15 years old

Clan Matriarch 45 years old
Clan third oldest 14 years old
Clan fourth oldest 12 years old

The second oldest male cannot be commanded by the third or fourth oldest, the age gap is too wide and they aren’t even in the same hierarchy or chain of command, necessarily. But the matriarch can command the second oldest male with authority equal to the patriarch, mostly.

The heir commands protects the second oldest male, forming a fraternal relationship similar to feudal relations. Protection in exchange for obedience and loyalty, honor for honor, love for love, obedience for security. The second oldest male then has his own responsibilities, he commands the third and fourth oldest. The third oldest, in the absence of any higher authority, is responsible for the guidance, protection, and safety of the fourth oldest.

Many US families are a de facto dictatorship. Extremely weak to insurgents or other attackers that prioritize hitting vulnerabilities and soft targets. A feudal system is not as “soft”, even the Japanese aristocrats, the samurai lineages, had their women train in the naginata for home defense. The women were objectively inferior to the males in the Japanese hierarchy, however, but that doesn’t stop them.

Btw, in a modern world, it wouldn’t necessarily matter if the heir was male. The designated heir, oldest scion, could be female as well. And they would have the same feudal responsibilities as a male heir.

In order to reinforce the chain of command and the loyalty of subordinates, special names and marks are used to designate one’s proper rank in the hierarchy. This rank is then reinforced when every member of the hierarchy recognizes who is above them and who is below them. Just like a very stable dog and wolf pack. Once the hierarchy is confirmed, violence reduces to almost nothing, everything else is handled via social reform and pressure. The males set an example as the protector of their families, so that their younger sisters can take as an example of what masculine qualities they would like to find in a husband. The younger sisters obey their brothers and help keep the family traditions alive with food culture or some other thing.

The issue of personal freedom usually comes into conflict, but given the social metamorphosis of the 21st century, most of that can be re-engineered. America has a black traitor on the Throne whipping whites and blacks around as a traitor King. Don’t tell me social norms can’t be modified, they certainly can be if the Will is there. Most people are gutless though. That’s what the hierarchy is, to force people to learn how to take responsibility and care for those weaker than them, while obeying those with stronger authorities of a proper nature.

The older family members are trained and conditioned to place their lives at risk to protect the youngest.

Thus even a 13 or 11 year old male is expected to jump in front of a rabid dog to shield his little sister or brother.

Insane and harsh? Perhaps. Warrior training, though, it qualifies. Better protection against pedos than the others, especially the ones in the family.

Because yes, the uncle can come in and scoop up some children for his fun, like Hollywood and Demoncrats do. But first they have to go through the direct superiors of those children, for those superiors will be watching their subordinates like a hawk. After all, without someone to obey them, they are just the gophers of their older brothers and sisters, appendages of their fathers and mothers. Parasites, helpless parasites. The motivation to change themselves, to become stronger and better humans, comes from the deepest depths of their heart. It cannot come from a dictatorship at the top suppressing dissent and Ordering People to Obey.

Mentality of killers and psychopaths

Posted July 14, 2015 by ymarsakar
Categories: violence

Here’s something new, which most people won’t understand.

A higher level warrior in society was often someone who could flip the “switch”. Meaning, they weren’t pro social psychopaths or sociopaths. They didn’t have insufficiently developed emotional imagination and empathy. When they were normal, they were normal socially conditioned members of their society. But when a threat faces them, they can switch off their emotions, killing their emotions, and go to town on the enemy.

People who are abnormal, are the ones that flip the switch and then can’t turn it back off again. Then they are in trouble.

This is triggered via a state consciousness shift, similar to snipers or killers that don’t need an emotion to justify their killing. The machine mind. The Zone.

This is why martial artists and other socially conditioned denizens like citizen soldiers, aren’t the most dangerous. They may get to that point after some experience, but the most dangerous are the weapons in human form. The ones that turn off their social morality matrix, their conscience, or their empathy, in order to defend X by destroying Y.

A fundamental difference is that a normal person that flips off the switch, can feel guilt. The abnormal person or the dysfunctional person, doesn’t feel guilt. He doesn’t even know that he did anything wrong, since the brain processes used to imagine it are turned off 100% all the time. He’d have to consciously think about it to figure it out.

From one perspective, a warrior doesn’t need emotions other than as motivation. A warrior doesn’t need hearing. A warrior doesn’t need to see color. All of that is wasteful brain processes that take up time, bandwidth, and oxygen. Eliminate them, shut them all down, and divert all power to the physical senses, reaction speed, and balance mechanisms, to unleash a human body’s full 100% power, rather than the 90% most people are capped at.

Compared to a human maximizing their animal and lizard survival instincts, creating a monopoly of control and precision, training and human abstract knowledge is not in and of itself enough to best it. Combining life and death battlefield experiences with mental and physical maturation, education, abstract knowledge, creates an ideal warrior philosopher, such as Socrates or Miyamoto Musashi or Sun Tzu.

The psychopath that cannot learn to put themselves in the shoes of their prey, will not be as effective as the full human who can use empathy to predict and manipulate their prey. However, learning to empathize with targets you kill, generates inordinate mental stress and attacks against the conscience, guilt, when the attacker lacks proper justifications for their actions. Justifying it based on “I was only following orders” is not enough. is the context for this topic.

Close range brawling

Posted July 12, 2015 by ymarsakar
Categories: Traditional Martial Arts

A lot of very good precepts, which I had to work out on my own, is in there explained as a lecture or rhetoric.

Things like this are much akin to horse riding or other martial skills like marksmanship or swordmanship. Hearing it theoretically is very different from understanding it physically. There’s a lot of details in horse riding that even a book cannot fully capture. For swordmanship, they don’t usually talk about the methods used to sheathe a sword. But that’s one of the more immediate and fundamental problems one faces when wielding a sword or wearing one. The ancients didn’t talk much about this because it was easy and everyone knew that it was an issue. Everyone except us, that is, in the modern world.

So for this video, it is speaking of the very basics, using reason rather than form or rigid rules. Even still, without personal experience, it is difficult to grasp fully enough for one to apply it in training or battle.

If a military had the choice of spending 500,000 dollars and 50 man hours of work, would they use it on H2H combat training or marksmanship and weapons training? People tend to prioritize the more effective route, given limited resources. That’s because that is the route with the shortest distance to the target. Martial arts or ancient traditions are often curves or quantum mechanical shapes, used to get to a destination .What is the shortest travel distance between A and B on a globe, a straight line or a curve? It’s a curve, because the situation is not ideal. It would only be a straight line if you could burrow through that much crust. Martial arts is often times a detour, or a curve. And for others, it is a straight line. The straight line express we no longer have, since it requires experience of a particular kind of fighting range that is rare. Miyamoto Musashi could directly learn the art of the sword, by fighting duels to the death. For the rest of us, we might have to do a Columbus detour or a Magellan detour.

Chi gong in Zhan Zhuang

Posted July 12, 2015 by ymarsakar
Categories: Traditional Martial Arts

Courtesy of G6.

A smart pro social sociopath or psychopath

Posted July 11, 2015 by ymarsakar
Categories: Psychology

Step out of line and see what happens Americans

Posted July 9, 2015 by ymarsakar
Categories: Politics, Unconventional Warfare

Do as you are told… or else.

The peasants are revolting except it’s not about bread

Posted July 3, 2015 by ymarsakar
Categories: Politics, Unconventional Warfare

This is the kind of grass roots revolt that communists and socialists merely gin up via money and illusion. It is related to the Gamersgate reaction and the VoxDay/baen author reaction to Tor and the Hugos in Science Fiction Writers of America.


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.