Archive for the ‘Psychology’ category

Benghazi movie and interview video up

January 6, 2016

Was actually pretty fun, courtesy of Grim Beorn’s blog

“What do you mean, the film depicts absolute hell” said the civilian and non warrior, albeit kawaii interviewer.

It’s an emotion that is hard to describe. Being so proud of the actions of people in your team, connected with them, that their life decisions are literally etched unto your heart as a physical sensation. I have experienced a similar simulated scenario, so I can only imagine how much their adrenaline imprinted emotions are stronger than even that.

That being drained, that hole in the heart, feels very familiar. It’s hard to describe the emotions in words, because they do come in sequence, they mix together to the point where it no longer is a normal emotion. It’s something else, a hybrid, depending on what mix and when they were mixed.

It’s similar to the bitter sweet pain that comes from watching a sunset or sunrise. The light hurts, but it is also beautiful, yet fleeting at the same time. That is how the lives of honorable men and women, who die in battle exemplifying the greatest warrior virtues in human history, look like. That is one ideal at least, and perhaps actual human experience is something different, due to words and languages changing the meaning and distorting it.

But it’s why when the civilian non warrior says that it is horrifying, it may not be horrifying. Or rather, without the horror, the pride and the etching of emotions unto the heart, would not be the same. The Tao is no longer the Tao when called the Tao in human language.

One justification I had heard is that many people are strongly motivated to ensure that their comrades had not died in vain, that they want to go back to the battlefield partially to ensure that the memories of their comrades are preserved, down the line or to future missions, and also partially in order to uphold their duty to the current generation in making sure they don’t die needlessly. Human emotions are kind of funny in that sense, the stronger it is, the more it needs to be expressed in physical action. Bottling it up isn’t necessarily a good idea.

And yes, it is funny at times too, recalling.

What I recall is that I remember thinking, that it was such a sad thing that this kind of unity would never reach the upper ranks of America’s chain of command. Maybe even before Benghazi happened. It was just a stark contrast. So many people fight to ensure the deaths of their comrades are not in vain, to save their fellow humans, yet I look above, and I see the darkness of utter evil. I hear their command:

“Stand down, let them die”

Internet economy

November 7, 2015

http://www.dangerandplay.com/2015/11/04/making-money-online-with-seo-marketing/

It’s an interesting collection of various internet economies, which only work because of the unregulated and tax free nature of the internet.

I’ve seen other, simulated, economies work like that as well, the ones with 1-5% taxes on everything. Some have passive incomes, others do not.

This economy, also is backdropped by a culture, and that culture is not necessarily going to go along with what the Leftist alliance for human utopia wants.

Now rebels without a cause or without a logistical economy, is pretty much dead. But the internet solves the economic issue at hand, but not the military one.

http://www.dangerandplay.com/2015/11/02/seth-rogen-wife-lauren-miller-rogen-mike-cernovich-cuckold-fetish/

This is an interesting example of a “fight” which didn’t involve physical fists. It interests me because the person plays psychological games and setups. Reminds me of certain things.

The Left’s mind control history

October 2, 2015

@196 @187

Speaking of mind control and Leftist techniques, there’s a couple of historical incidences which I’ve researched.

1. Patricia Hearst’s kidnapping and subsequent direct neural programming via rape and fear (Stockholm Syndrome like) by a Leftist para military gang.

2. 1970 ish direct memory programming via regressive hypnosis, to implant false memories of child rape and molestation in targeted subjects, allowing lawyers to get rich off law suits, destroying families.

These were all proto type Leftist, Communist, Marxist, New Age, or merely Soviet KGB funded weapons research and development of modern mind control techniques. I say it is prototype, because the kind of rape conditioning by PProfit and the universities these days, are orders of levels more effective, mass reproducible, and more effective than the type of brainwashing Leftists had to use before. Leftists often had to use direct methods, to reach the neural systems of their subjects directly, via physical contact or close authoritarian auras, before affecting reprogramming. Jim Jones is another example of using the iron fist to control subjects.

Without the iron fist most of these subjects would revert, as Patricia Hearst reverted, and Jim Jones’ cult would have escaped since they were more afraid of him than the CIA. The die hards would be left behind. Jim Jones was using assault rifle armed (Leftists love gun control and people control) guards to keep the families there, and telling them that if they don’t force their kids to drink the Kool Aid serum, that the CIA will do horrible things to them when they capture them.

The Left’s modern mind control programs revolves mostly around self reinforcing shackles people have willingly placed on their mind and their heart. It cannot be removed, because while a slave may be freed if you cut down the shackles and make him aware that there is a better life in freedom… can a slave be truly freed if that slave loves being a slave?

For people familiar with game, this is the ancient form of NLP. Neural Linguistic Programming, some people in the various game or pick up artist communities use or find useful. In other words, conversational hypnosis and implantation of triggers. Mass reproducible, effective, techniques which does not require the hard fist of a police state or a gun to activate.

Linguistics, as a kind of human programming code which can be cracked and hacked, is also research that Leftists like Chomsky have conducted. All of the Left’s research is piled together and weaponized, using funding from money laundering orgs like PProfit, ACORN, SEIU, etc.

A potential reason why a lot of feminists believe all men are rapists or the 1/5 fake stat on university campuses, might be due to displacement. They cannot become angry at being raped by Leftists, so they get angry at other people who they think are enemies and easily crushed. This provides a smoke screen for the Left’s rapists and rape gangs, since the victims they damage, will merely become a weapon that they can use against non Leftists. It is one theory as for why the Left’s brainwashing is so effective.

Blast from the Past: Yuri Bezmenov again

September 26, 2015

This is a great time to watch one of the oldies, for those who wondered how Western culture got to where it is right now. Disinformation, cultural subversion, good stuff.

Disinformation part comes in after the 1 hour mark, right at the end almost. That’s usually what was extracted from this much longer interview, since the end was what caught people’s attention, mostly.

A smart pro social sociopath or psychopath

July 11, 2015

http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2014/01/life-as-a-nonviolent-psychopath/282271/

Neuroscientist James Fallon discovered through his work that he has the brain of a psychopath, and subsequently learned a lot about the role of genes in personality and how his brain affects his life.

Minor comment on current day Americans and loyalty to country, Christianity, and the Left’s Messiah death cult

May 14, 2015

People place too much confidence in their ability to determine people’s motivations, beliefs, and thoughts. They may be accurate for some people, but that does not extend to the majority of either faction.

It is especially inaccurate for people who cannot make accurate predictions about the present or future, to then use that inaccurate personal judgment to decide what a bunch of people they have never met, feels, thinks, and knows.

It’s not something they can know. All they know is the people they’ve interviewed and interrogated, which isn’t even a good sized sample.

[This is a reference to the subject of whether Democrats are guilt or not, and whether they are ignorant or not, and whether they harbor malicious intentions or whether Hussein is just incompetent. The entire manifold complex]

A profiler or interrogator that tries to take random samplings of what people say and then use that as a way to judge the expressions, lies, and emotional reactions of the subject in front of them, isn’t conducting any kind of professional operation.

It may be a scientific study, but the results will be less practical and far too abstract to be of immediate use.

Of course the reverse may also be true, where anyone who interviews a single family member then somehow thinks they have the Skeleton key to unlock the psychological secrets of everybody else on this planet.

In the end, the proof is in the prediction and the percentage of accuracy. I told people that the Left obeys authority and that all of them would have little trouble obeying the Death Squads or giving those extermination groups the locations of American patriots. GB talked about people being innocent because they are ignorant. As the US authorities care about ignorance as being a defense in crimes. But even if they do, it doesn’t change the highly inaccurate portrayals and theories presented by the “we know they are ignorant of this” line of theorizing.

Are we supposed to take their words at face value? So when Islamic Jihad says Islam is peace and that they are peaceful, we take at face value their “good intentions”. Of what purpose or benefit does that serve?

If the Left and Islam says they will kill you and then they actually go out and kill someone, that has weight to it. But the mere words people espouse about their own intentions have little weight to them in and of itself.

When the Left shows by their words and actions that they are innocent, does that mean they won’t ever push the security button to let the death squads in the door? What matters are their actions, not the words they use to cover up their intentions. Nor does it matter what their intentions are, what matters is what they actually do and how their behavior fits into the predictive models. A model using good intentions and the previous words of people to gauge their danger levels is not going to be able to handle things. Humans are fickle, they can decide at any time to obey evil, and they already have.

In the past it was difficult to obtain relevant examples of people obeying death squads or providing information detrimental to American patriots. The IRS changed that. The Texas shootings changed that. But even then, there were plenty of examples before then. They just weren’t relevant to the people who obtained the “good intentions” of the Left from their friendly neighborhood association of families. They just weren’t relevant to the people who obtained their good impression of homos and Islamos from their friendly neighborhood proto Gaystapo and Islamic Muslim “free speech” good intentioned “Americans”.

Since a good intentioned Muslim can obey the evil of Islam at any moment, what does it matter whether GB says their intentions are good or not? What does it matter if the Left says their intentions are good or not? It doesn’t even matter what their intentions are.

Homos had good intentions? Maybe. Until the Gaystapo told them to find the heretics and make them pay. Then those good intentions kind of evaporated. Funny enough that’s the reality people don’t want to deal with. They keep making excuses that they couldn’t predict it ahead of time. Obviously you can’t predict anything by relying on people’s proclaimed good intent.

That’s what happens when people place an overly high importance on reading intentions. Being right doesn’t mean they can deal with what people do.

Public officials and individuals like Clinton are much easier to read. Their profiling is much more useful and calculating the intent or not of Hussein may or may not be useful. But I avoid the claim that Hussein had good or bad intentions. Evil isn’t about intent. Whether Hussein destroys the US or not, is an element of fate, it is not an element of what people intend to do. But if it helps people understand that someone is evil by convincing them that they intended it, there is plenty of evidence to support that as well if needed. But the proof of evil does not require intent. Obedience to evil does not require bad or good intentions.

A so called American can claim to be for free speech and still be against Palin and Geller. Hypocrisy is not the point in this context, the point is that their actions matter more than what they say.

If the predicton is correct that Leftists obey evil, then until someone with “good intentions” refuses to obey the Left, what does it matter what people think that intention is? Once they refuse to obey the Left, they stop being a Leftist. Of course there are people who fall from the Circle and try to get back in, I’m sure their good intentions will not save them from the fire or from the guilt. Getting back into the den of evil after they threw a person out, is that person good or bad? Good intentioned or bad intentioned? I’m not sure it matters and in fact there’s a lot of arguments I use to demonstrate that it matters not.

When humans are under Authority, what they will do is based on the orders they get from that Authority. There’s no such thing as free will there in the enemy. That’s not what we are dealing with here. If they are told to give up the locations of Tea Party patriots to the death squads, the Left will. And it does not matter whether people like to differentiate them into “innocent” ignorant savages with good intentions or whether they want to differentiate them into the elite priest leadership cadre of the Clintons and Messiah Husseins. One may give the orders and the other obeys, but both are guilty. Merely because one party has more guilt, does not exonerate the other parties involved.

Activists interviewing Californians on gay and homo marriage

May 3, 2015

I wouldn’t call this edifying. I would call this a grand example of mind control, a WMDeception. http://x.vindicosuite.com/click/fbfpc=1;v=5;m=3;l=401071;c=776283;b=3368032;dct=http%3A//www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/555/the-incredible-rarity-of-changing-your-mind

But for the record, it is a good progression of mind control techniques. On to my reply for it.

What the activist is doing is called conditioning the subject via a verbal conversation, thus developing a personal relationship in order to exert a personal influence.

It’s much akin to what any charismatic leader can do to their subordinates, merely by being present.

Mind control is where a person changes his mind, and he thinks he did it himself. In reality, some other puppet master was pulling his string son that matter.

While it is relatively easy for a person to become a puppet if they fall for certain influences, it is much more difficult for a patriot to attempt to take away the puppet strings of someone who is already a puppet.

You have to be better than the original puppetmaster. Are you?

Being influenced by other people, even strangers who talk to you, is something I’ve seen and done. But propagandists and those who resist the lure of authority, cannot become the subjects of their own experiments or power. If they are, they’re incompetent. They cannot become better than other puppet masters by being incompetent.

It is extremely rare to find a person who cannot be influenced by external factors.

When the Homos used burning churches and terror tactics against Prop 8 in California, that didn’t achieve desired results, other than the destruction of enemies of the state. So they did a more subtle trick, which is called mind control or aka Deception. They claimed that homo marriage would not coerce or affect the majority of Normals, that in fact the Majority of Normals are crushing the minority of homos.

As we can see, that was a mere fabrication, a deception. You’ll have the same rights as other Americans. You just won’t have a family, a life, children, or a business. You’ll be in a camp, same as other Americans.

Link Courtesy of Neo Neocon


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.