Archive for the ‘Psychology’ category
Minor comment on current day Americans and loyalty to country, Christianity, and the Left’s Messiah death cultMay 14, 2015
People place too much confidence in their ability to determine people’s motivations, beliefs, and thoughts. They may be accurate for some people, but that does not extend to the majority of either faction.
It is especially inaccurate for people who cannot make accurate predictions about the present or future, to then use that inaccurate personal judgment to decide what a bunch of people they have never met, feels, thinks, and knows.
It’s not something they can know. All they know is the people they’ve interviewed and interrogated, which isn’t even a good sized sample.
[This is a reference to the subject of whether Democrats are guilt or not, and whether they are ignorant or not, and whether they harbor malicious intentions or whether Hussein is just incompetent. The entire manifold complex]
A profiler or interrogator that tries to take random samplings of what people say and then use that as a way to judge the expressions, lies, and emotional reactions of the subject in front of them, isn’t conducting any kind of professional operation.
It may be a scientific study, but the results will be less practical and far too abstract to be of immediate use.
Of course the reverse may also be true, where anyone who interviews a single family member then somehow thinks they have the Skeleton key to unlock the psychological secrets of everybody else on this planet.
In the end, the proof is in the prediction and the percentage of accuracy. I told people that the Left obeys authority and that all of them would have little trouble obeying the Death Squads or giving those extermination groups the locations of American patriots. GB talked about people being innocent because they are ignorant. As the US authorities care about ignorance as being a defense in crimes. But even if they do, it doesn’t change the highly inaccurate portrayals and theories presented by the “we know they are ignorant of this” line of theorizing.
Are we supposed to take their words at face value? So when Islamic Jihad says Islam is peace and that they are peaceful, we take at face value their “good intentions”. Of what purpose or benefit does that serve?
If the Left and Islam says they will kill you and then they actually go out and kill someone, that has weight to it. But the mere words people espouse about their own intentions have little weight to them in and of itself.
When the Left shows by their words and actions that they are innocent, does that mean they won’t ever push the security button to let the death squads in the door? What matters are their actions, not the words they use to cover up their intentions. Nor does it matter what their intentions are, what matters is what they actually do and how their behavior fits into the predictive models. A model using good intentions and the previous words of people to gauge their danger levels is not going to be able to handle things. Humans are fickle, they can decide at any time to obey evil, and they already have.
In the past it was difficult to obtain relevant examples of people obeying death squads or providing information detrimental to American patriots. The IRS changed that. The Texas shootings changed that. But even then, there were plenty of examples before then. They just weren’t relevant to the people who obtained the “good intentions” of the Left from their friendly neighborhood association of families. They just weren’t relevant to the people who obtained their good impression of homos and Islamos from their friendly neighborhood proto Gaystapo and Islamic Muslim “free speech” good intentioned “Americans”.
Since a good intentioned Muslim can obey the evil of Islam at any moment, what does it matter whether GB says their intentions are good or not? What does it matter if the Left says their intentions are good or not? It doesn’t even matter what their intentions are.
Homos had good intentions? Maybe. Until the Gaystapo told them to find the heretics and make them pay. Then those good intentions kind of evaporated. Funny enough that’s the reality people don’t want to deal with. They keep making excuses that they couldn’t predict it ahead of time. Obviously you can’t predict anything by relying on people’s proclaimed good intent.
That’s what happens when people place an overly high importance on reading intentions. Being right doesn’t mean they can deal with what people do.
Public officials and individuals like Clinton are much easier to read. Their profiling is much more useful and calculating the intent or not of Hussein may or may not be useful. But I avoid the claim that Hussein had good or bad intentions. Evil isn’t about intent. Whether Hussein destroys the US or not, is an element of fate, it is not an element of what people intend to do. But if it helps people understand that someone is evil by convincing them that they intended it, there is plenty of evidence to support that as well if needed. But the proof of evil does not require intent. Obedience to evil does not require bad or good intentions.
A so called American can claim to be for free speech and still be against Palin and Geller. Hypocrisy is not the point in this context, the point is that their actions matter more than what they say.
If the predicton is correct that Leftists obey evil, then until someone with “good intentions” refuses to obey the Left, what does it matter what people think that intention is? Once they refuse to obey the Left, they stop being a Leftist. Of course there are people who fall from the Circle and try to get back in, I’m sure their good intentions will not save them from the fire or from the guilt. Getting back into the den of evil after they threw a person out, is that person good or bad? Good intentioned or bad intentioned? I’m not sure it matters and in fact there’s a lot of arguments I use to demonstrate that it matters not.
When humans are under Authority, what they will do is based on the orders they get from that Authority. There’s no such thing as free will there in the enemy. That’s not what we are dealing with here. If they are told to give up the locations of Tea Party patriots to the death squads, the Left will. And it does not matter whether people like to differentiate them into “innocent” ignorant savages with good intentions or whether they want to differentiate them into the elite priest leadership cadre of the Clintons and Messiah Husseins. One may give the orders and the other obeys, but both are guilty. Merely because one party has more guilt, does not exonerate the other parties involved.
I wouldn’t call this edifying. I would call this a grand example of mind control, a WMDeception. http://x.vindicosuite.com/click/fbfpc=1;v=5;m=3;l=401071;c=776283;b=3368032;dct=http%3A//www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/555/the-incredible-rarity-of-changing-your-mind
But for the record, it is a good progression of mind control techniques. On to my reply for it.
What the activist is doing is called conditioning the subject via a verbal conversation, thus developing a personal relationship in order to exert a personal influence.
It’s much akin to what any charismatic leader can do to their subordinates, merely by being present.
Mind control is where a person changes his mind, and he thinks he did it himself. In reality, some other puppet master was pulling his string son that matter.
While it is relatively easy for a person to become a puppet if they fall for certain influences, it is much more difficult for a patriot to attempt to take away the puppet strings of someone who is already a puppet.
You have to be better than the original puppetmaster. Are you?
Being influenced by other people, even strangers who talk to you, is something I’ve seen and done. But propagandists and those who resist the lure of authority, cannot become the subjects of their own experiments or power. If they are, they’re incompetent. They cannot become better than other puppet masters by being incompetent.
It is extremely rare to find a person who cannot be influenced by external factors.
When the Homos used burning churches and terror tactics against Prop 8 in California, that didn’t achieve desired results, other than the destruction of enemies of the state. So they did a more subtle trick, which is called mind control or aka Deception. They claimed that homo marriage would not coerce or affect the majority of Normals, that in fact the Majority of Normals are crushing the minority of homos.
As we can see, that was a mere fabrication, a deception. You’ll have the same rights as other Americans. You just won’t have a family, a life, children, or a business. You’ll be in a camp, same as other Americans.
Link Courtesy of Neo Neocon
In a hierarchy, the leadership usually occupies the alpha position in part or in whole. Marc MacYoung wrote some interesting social descriptions of what that entails, although he gets into too much playing his own role with the violence vs prison debate.
A leader usually has to have someone who obeys them, male or female. The group can consist of 2 people or more. In exchange for fealty and loyalty, protection and resources are offered, along with civic virtues or social harmony. Similar to feudalism in that respect.
Most of MacYoung’s social descriptions can be found at no non sense self defense dot com.
Principally, an alpha would be at the top of one hierarchy, so would command obedience and loyalty from their group. If there is evidence of contested issues, or there are rebels there, and basically if people in the group don’t look like they obey one leader, then the alpha’s position is eroded in the views of others. This often incites verbal or physical violence, in order to discipline members. Which is often why people part of gangs cannot backdown when they are in sight of their women or their male subordinates, it is a loss of face or respect. People who might normally backdown if they were alone, would refuse to in a group, because they are thinking of the future social status they would lose.
Cockney humour, being crazy, or escalating violence to a point where it pressures the entire mob, may be used as justifications for the group backing off. If everyone in a group is scared or doesn’t find it offensive, then they are just waiting for the leader to tell them all to go, there will be less reasons to contest that decision later on.
There’s usually that one guy, the lieutenant (beta or gamma), who might find certain things offensive, whether to himself, his group, or his leader. So to defend his leader’s honor, he often picks or starts fights with people. That’s because in a sense, the lieutenant’s social status is dependent upon his leader and group’s social status in the urban jungle. If it there is insult or decline in it, then his own status also declines. For someone lower on the totem pole, that’s not really a concern, but for someone near the top of his own social hierarchy, it is a concern.
The ideal of an alpha is one that has hidden resources, talents, powers, or non physical traits like ruthlessness backing it up. That makes em like a superhero or masked ally of justice, to his own team. But only to his own team. This resource may be political or alliance connections. It may be economic wealth. It may be physical prowess or mastery of arcane or lethal force.
In modern society, people follow orders because their Authority told them to, but their Authority is generally the Law or some nebulous, arcane, or abstract figure who they don’t know. I think people are usually somewhat dissatisfied with that. Women used to subordinate themselves to the authority of their father, mother, older brother, older sister, etc. Which seemed to work fine, mostly. Now they are told they are equal to everybody else, except the Omnipotent Abstract Authority on the throne of political and legal power. And they don’t feel comfortable with that position of equality. They don’t feel confident, they rebel at any hint of disrespect, questioning, or challenge from their significant other. There is no hierarchy, and that usually means war and conflict. It was one thing for their ancestors to rebel, they knew what they were getting into with feminism and lobbying for equal voting or work opportunities. They had a chance at motherhood and even tried it out, but wanted something more. These days, the modern “normals” are on the path because somebody told them to get on that path. Which is little different from the patrician authority the feminist first wave ancestors fought against, refusing to do as they were told.
[Transition to the writing about the South before and after Civil War I]
The legions still loyal to the Democrat culture and cause, must paint Lincoln and Sherman in one fashion because of how they defeated their enemies, even though Grant killed a lot more on both sides. Much in the same way Pinochet is feared and reviled for killing Leftists. It’s because he actually killed Leftists, too many of them, and the majority weren’t just innocents, which the Left would prefer in the case of Ted Kennedy at least.
The Democrat cause became aligned with the Leftist cause soon after they joined into an alliance. Never were they for civil rights, state’s rights, or anything else that the propaganda claimed. It was mostly to support the Democrat aristocracy’s base of power, economic or political.
As a result, most of America’s recent wars have been literally sabotaged by Democrats for one reason or another. Even in the countries that America’s military was not told to go to, such as Cuba, Iran, Rhodesia, etc, the Democrats still helped them to be destroyed. The war thing is mostly a distraction or an unintended consequence of two different factions fighting in the US, and when one loses the fight, the allies overseas is lost as well. It’s not just a proxy war between the Taliban and America in Afghanistan, or the Soviets and the US in Vietnam, those conflicts are also proxy wars between Democrat traitors and every other faction in the US.
Democrats own blacks as slaves because blacks were always told that the Man was keeping them down and only white Democrat politicians could give them jobs and freedom from tyranny. Ironically, that’s what was told to white Southerners to get them to die for the Democrat power base in Civil War I. Somebody had to be a villain back there.
Reconstruction failed mostly because Sherman didn’t kill nearly enough of the Southern aristocracy. That was intentional. All the starvation, looting, and economic collapse was mostly the result of Democrats hoarding all the money and wealth in order to gain absolute control over the people, by conveniently finding a scapegoat while controlling the economic handouts. The KKK was ordered back then to lynch white Republicans, black Republicans, and anybody else that opposed Democrat political control. Any money that might have flowed in from Northern investors were killed off by assassinations and then Democrats took it over. But it was never going to be enough to actually feed the people or fix the broken Southern economy.
The Southern economy wasn’t fixed until people admitted openly to voting in Republicans and breaking the Democrat stranglehold. To the point where even now, Democrats have never forgiven the betrayal of the “Bible and gun clinging” Southerners. But that doesn’t mean the propaganda from 1820-1880 was merely forgotten by descendants of propagandized and manipulated families. Black families often believe Lincoln was a Democrat, thus giving their fealty to an enemy of their race, the Democrat machine. It is easy for them to justify, and that was only a few decades under Democrat rule. The Southern families have been under Democrat rot for a lot longer than that.
This is often why people said going to shrinks was going to make you crazier.
And it’s also probably why regressive hypnotic therapy (brainwashing and indoctrination) became very popular and profitable.
This is why I said years ago, that torture, the true art of torture, can make people believe that they are on our side and should disclose all the details of their terrorist cell operations. Because they will honestly believe, that they were on our side, and not theirs. It only requires sufficient pressure to shatter a person’s mind and reform it. Merely that. Breaking the body is only making the mold easier to form, the mind is what we are truly searching for, because the mind thinks it knows the truth. Having problems getting people to tell you the truth? Either the interrogator used his authority to demand something other than the truth, or more processing is needed.
And the media is responsible for most of the crime in America. (This was written before the race riots of 2014 or Civil War II)
All of these techniques, the Left knew about and knew how effective they are. They are using them even now in universities against American kids. And they knew the effect of Authority in interrogation when they claimed GitMo was about using torture to get false confessions. They know very well what false confessions are, they are the experts on such after all.
This is the Left. In the Middle East, they are ruled by similar folk and have been so for generations. What people think are the “causes” of such violence, like poverty or land… they have no damn clue. And never will. To know the art of indoctrination requires a brain, after all. The Palestinian death cult is not concerned with poverty or injustice. That’s not what cults are for.
Remember the Renos during Clinton, how they went after David Koresh at WACO? This following a long line of the prosecution making a name for themselves by prosecuting parents for, get this, satanic cult rituals and child abuse. All from testimony obtained through torturing and isolating the children in Reno’s concentration camps. This is the Left. Never forget.
This is what they are. This is what they always have been. The weak minded, the dependent, the drug addicted, the kiddies lacking a spine, all are meat and grist for the Mill of Indoctrination. They will Believe what they are Told to Believe. And there, they will end, as puppets forevermore.
Such is the power of the Leftist alliance that they can create a Slave Empire where the slaves honestly and falsely believe they are free. How do you think they do it? That is not covered in public education and for good reason. Only specialists and crazy people have ever touched upon the forbidden knowledge.
A few paradigm changes in belief.
It’s not a change via logic or debate, but a change in a person’s faith based beliefs. That is far more difficult to change, especially when people like to cover it up and call their religion their ‘Politics’. There have been various rebellions of this sort in black communities, although they are often ignored or crushed into disappearance.
After all, with the IRS on Tea Parties, it’s not as if Republicans or Democrats have not used the national force to get rid of competition before.
Watching Ace of Diamond makes baseball make a lot more sense. Moving fastball with cutters.