Archive for the ‘Politics’ category

Counter Revolutionary methods against the Left

July 18, 2015

Occam’s B was a commenter at a certain blog. While I didn’t consider his scientific opinions to be superior to the common mob of the “scientific consensus”, he was pretty clever in other areas. This methodology is something I’ve applied myself and it works. Perhaps because it is a counter technique, not a defensive technique. Defense, huddling in a turtle ball while you get raped and beat on, doesn’t necessarily breed confidence or joy in a human.

Occam’s Beard Says:
September 29th, 2010 at 8:23 pm
“Yesterday, we sat and listened to diatribes about Reagan being terrible for the US, gun-rights proponents being wrong and dangerous, Tea partiers being radicals, etc., etc.”

We’ve commented on this before – the peculiar tendency of leftists/liberals to presuppose that everyone agrees with them, election results notwithstanding.

It may be a social signaling device, a shibboleth, on their part to pre-emptively assert their “coolness” and then await accolades from the assembled comrades.

Or it may just be garden-variety ignorance and lack of social graces.

“But I am very embarrassed at my own lack of self defense.”

No need to be embarrassed; it’s probably a waste of breath to present the opposing viewpoint. Perhaps more productive is to plant the seed of doubt/thought in the fertile soil between their ears, and let it go at that.

One example is turning leftist viewpoints back on one’s interlocutor apparently without noticing the conflict, viz., if talking to a liberal physician, go on a tear about how Obama’s absolutely right that doctors yank out body parts just to turn a buck, and that you for one are glad that Obama (keep using His name) has had the courage to punish such parasites and cut back their income. It’s for the children!

Other examples include:

1. Talking up militant unionism to anyone who has to (or in some future development, may have to) deal with them.

2. To a liberal mom holding forth about her child’s performance in school, talk about how the Dems are absolutely right that grades are elitist and merely reflective of class advantages, that her child should be sent to an inner city school to learn about the downtrodden, and that since all children are equally valuable they should therefore all receive the same grade. (If anything brings out the hard-nosed side of most women, it’s something that disadvantages their children. And quite right, too.)

3. To a liberal dad who’s proud of his son, talk up homosexuality, and tell him you agree that all children should be taught the …uh…ins and outs of all the myriad “lifestyles” Dems support, and encouraged to try them all. If he’s proud of a daughter, talk about how you approve of abortion without parental consent, and think that the Dems are right to support illegitimate births among teen-aged girls.

4. To accusations of “Islamophobia,” from a liberal who is female, Jewish, homosexual, or a non-believer, extol the virtues of Islam, and speak approvingly of Islamic policies toward the group to which your interlocutor belongs. (“No, no, I admire Islam. They sure know how to keep their ________ in line, don’t they? We could learn a lot from them.”)

5. To union members, talk about how you approve of the Dem’s environmental policies. “Barack’s right, we must preserve the environment for the spotted howling cockroach, no matter how many jobs are lost. Losing blue-collar jobs is a small price to pay for seeing the cockroaches gambol merrily in a pristine habitat.”

6. To someone who makes a lot of money, talk about how everything over some sum (choose, say, 70% of the guy’s annual income) should be confiscated in taxes and given to the poor. He’s got so much, they’ve got so little. It’s not fair!

7. Car buff? Government Motors should produce only strictly utilitarian transport (Trabants!) They’re good enough for the proletariat.

You get the idea. Dem policies have a thousand cleavage planes in them, because they’ve cobbled together a whole bunch of groups that have mutually exclusive views. Jam the person’s face in the part that’s repellent to him, but act as though you presume he – as a Dem – will agree. The hard part is keeping a straight face.

Additionally, just for fun, with people who don’t know my actual views, I sometimes like to use psychic ju-jitsu; express agreement, and then go progressively (sorry) even further left to titrate their views, ending up waxing eloquent about policies that would make Karl Marx squirm. (Think Kim Jong Il’s press secretary and you’ve got the idea.) The trick is to see how far you can go without the other person realizing that you’re engaging in parody. It’s amusing to watch initial smiles of agreement slowly slip, and even more so if they start arguing a more conservative line.

Step out of line and see what happens Americans

July 9, 2015

http://reason.com/blog/2015/04/20/inside-the-raids-and-investigations-that#.u7kots:fUWf

http://reason.com/reasontv/2015/07/07/ken-white-on-how-he-broke-reason-subpoen

Do as you are told… or else.

The peasants are revolting except it’s not about bread

July 3, 2015

http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2015/07/02/reddit-revolt-flares-again-as-ama-moderator-sacked-the-day-after-a-disastrous-jesse-jackson-qa/

This is the kind of grass roots revolt that communists and socialists merely gin up via money and illusion. It is related to the Gamersgate reaction and the VoxDay/baen author reaction to Tor and the Hugos in Science Fiction Writers of America.

Previously on Leftist lies

June 30, 2015

http://neoneocon.com/2007/09/04/figureground-perceptions-of-the-vietnam-and-iraq-wars/#comment-41824

Way back in September of 2007, where people were in a very unique position to judge American history, we had this Leftist commenter grace the halls of one particular blog writer.

What is fascinating about the Hunt Oil story and pending exploration agreement is that the Kurdish region is stable and makes continued economic development possible. The Kurdish region is also where not a single American soldier has died–I believe this is correct–and only about 50 Americans are needed. As I recall, less than 100 Americans were sufficient to secure the area in the battle for Iraq. The Kurds even has regular tourist flights from Europe. All this has been the case since the establishment of the original no fly zones. And no war was needed to secure the Kurdish areas. So, the Kurds are safe without a shot fired or American killed. They are a functioning and structured society now, just as they were before the war and just as they will remain once we withdraw. Looks like Mr. Biden’s notions about Iraq stability are correct. – A Donald fascist of the Left

My response:


Except for the fact that the Kurds view Bush’s family as their saviors. Which you will conveniently leave out because the Kurds are just props for your propaganda. You have to have them to shield your policies and convince people that what comes afterwards won’t be your fault.

We could explain why the Kurds are special, but that won’t do anything because in your mind, Donald, what is special is Bush’s failure, not the Kurd’s success.

They were already creating their guilt blocks and selling their souls off for salvation, way back in 2007. By policies, I meant all the traitors, Democrats, and saboteurs who wanted Iraq to be destroyed or the US to be defeated there. By “what comes afterwards”, that was based on my belief that the Democrats would crush Iraq once they got rid of Bush. Given that ISIS is marching through and through, helped along with funding and training from Hussein and the State Department, that’s pretty accurate a prediction, even if I do say so myself. What came afterwards, what ISIS and AQ did in Iraq is definitely the fault of Leftists.

They should be hated and dealt with, on that basis alone. Of course there are plenty of other reasons. For those that taunted American patriots in 2005 about not sending their children to the war in Iraq, how about you guys here in America realizing that none of you will be spared in CW II? There’s a war you can participate in, including your entire family.

Militaristic cultural clubs in other societies beyond the Western navel gazing

June 4, 2015

This is what the world is doing while Americans self destruct and slaughter the strongest patriots in recent human existence. (Fort Hood 1, 2, Navy, purging of patriotic factions due to Democrat generals)

North Korea also has several women bureaucrats in photos I’ve seen.

The “patriarchy” Americans are fighting against is a funny propaganda control device. They are as militarized and obedient as the Russians and Ukrainians. They just think they are “free” unlike their foreign counter parts. The military is merely a hierarchy, where when an order comes, no matter what it is, it will be obeyed. Much as if Jesus or God commanded their disciples, the disciples would obey that command. No matter the price. We have seen what religious fanaticism lends to the Muslims and the Arabs. It is no minor joke, what people usually find funny about Mormons, the Amish, and the Jehovah’s Witnesses. Westerners think they are free, thus they do not suffer under a military esque hierarchy. How little do they know the truth.

The idea that the patriarchy is this creepy, old fashioned, obsolete system that has women in the kitchen and barefoot, is a quaint concept. One born of Leftist fevered dreams of dominion and conquest more than anything that reality considered workable. While weaklings find internet comments “unsettling” and uncomfortable, the world produces warriors and soldiers that will gladly kill you. But that’s not uncomfortable, because that’s something Americans refuse to accept as important. Like Hussein on the golf course, they got their head stuck in the sand waving their hands around, ordering the tsunami to pass them by unharmed.

Every nation has a legendary myth that helps generate continued value retention across the generations. Defense, virtue, work ethic, and a whole assembly of various other cultural add ons. Yet few nations have survived this.

“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.”

A nation survives through a multitude of mistakes and correct actions. People hope that the lives sacrificed and the work given, produces more good than mistakes.

America is ruled by foreign terrorists, or essentially will be. That’s not a “mistake”. That’s not the Russians making up back story to make themselves look good, so they can maintain civic morale in wars and peace. That’s gone far beyond the limit.

From SFWA to the Hugo Awards battle of SJW

May 31, 2015

https://theartsmechanical.wordpress.com/2015/05/28/eric-flint-owes-brad-torgeson-and-the-rest-of-the-puppies-a-huge-apology/

Lesser known front on the war.

Huge number of un edited spelling mistakes, but I got through most of them. They really need a reader that can get 99.5% of written errors in one pass though.

Politics and books didn’t use to be a shared category, until recently perhaps.

Dixie crats turning Republican is what people use to defend Democrat racism

May 2, 2015

It’s often been used as an excuse or justification, to explain why Democrats in the Solid South turned their backs on the Democrat party, whether nationally or at the local level.

It is a strange propaganda defense, used more to justify Democrat racial and hierarchy policies than anything else. It covers up the real foundation of the Democrat party which sparked the US Civil War I and it gives people an easy enemy to dislike, the Republicans, by projecting or displacing the Democrat party’s faults and historical crimes against their enemies, the Republicans. Like the black communities of today, it is easy hating and blaming the “Man” for various things the Democrat community did. And if you criticize that status quo stance, they think you’re a race traitor or betrayer of your community, when you go up against the community organizers.

It may have been pretty useful and strong in the days when the Democrat party rewrote the history books for the South, after winning the post war Reconstruction with KKK terror tactics, but it is getting far weaker now.

People like to forget that the Democrat controlled Southern ancestors considered those black Republicans to be low class serfs, slaves in all but name except to the Republicans rather than to the Democrats. It shows the kind of racial superiority profiling and prejudice that was produced in the South as a result of Democrat culture, politics, and money. The Democrats were using blacks to bolster their representation slice in Congress as well as using slave property to boost their personal wealth. The fact that most Southerners didn’t own slaves mattered little, given that loyalty to home was strong enough to even draw General Lee back to the Virginian cause, even though Lee despised the ownership of slaves. He wasn’t the Democrat political elite that decided a war was a good idea, however.

A minor group at the top bringing their home to destruction and wasting the lives of the community, sounds familiar to Ferguson or Baltimore or any other Democrat fiefdom aka city. History merely repeats itself in a different arrangement, a war that must be fought again for the same general reasons.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.