Archive for the ‘History’ category

Abraham Lincoln the Lawyer years

June 26, 2018

I found many of the primary historical lines and sources very interesting, in light of all this Civil War 2 news out there. Which to me is merely old news.

The next significant series of events involve a Roman Catholic priest by the name of Charles Chiniquy. Now while it is true that such Jesuit priests play both sides, this particular man seemed, by his actions, to be a man of integrity. Chiniquy consistently roused the ire of his bishop and even of the Vatican itself by speaking out whenever church actions conflicted with the Bible.

In one such exchange, Mr. Chiniquy had called the Bishop of Chicago a usurper for improper use of church power to take the property of Catholics. Bishop O’Regan of Chicago raged “You are half a Protestant! Your words smell of Protestantism! The Gospel! the Gospel! that is your great tower of strength against the laws and regulations of our holy church! If you think, Mr. Chiniquy, that you will frighten me with your big words of the Gospel, you will soon see your mistake, at your own expense. I will make you remember that it is the Church you must obey, and it is through your bishop that the church rules you!”

“My lord,” Chiniquy answered, “I want to obey the church. Yes! but it is a church founded on the Gospel; a church that respects and follows the Gospel, that I want to obey!”

It was after this episode that the bishop’s agents brought around trumped up charges to frame Chiniquy. The case appeared before the Criminal Court of Kankakee (Illinois) in November 1855. Chiniquy won this round in a series of legal battles with the powers of the Bishop of Chicago. The lawyer for the prosecution was Peter Spink, who appealed the case to the Court of Urbana, in Champaign County.

The heavy-hearted Chiniquy began to leave the court building when a stranger approached him and said: “I have followed your suit from the beginning. It is more formidable than you suspect. Your prosecutor, Spink, is only an instrument in the hands of the bishop. The real prosecutor is the land shark who is at the head of the diocese, and who is destroying our holy religion by his private and public scandals. As you are the only one among his priests who dares to resist him, he is determined to get rid of you: he will spend all his treasures and use the almost irresistible influence of his position to crush you. The misfortune for you is that, when you fight a bishop, you fight all the bishops of the world. They will unite all their wealth and influence to Bishop O’Regan’s to silence you, though they hate and despise him. There was no danger of any verdict against you in this part of Illinois, where you are too well known for the perjured witnesses they have brought to influence your judges. But when you are among strangers, mind what I tell you: the false oaths of your enemies may be accepted as gospel truths by the jury, and then, though innocent, you are lost. Though your two lawyers are expert men, you will want something better at Urbana. Try to secure the services of Abraham Lincoln, of Springfield. If that man defends you, you will surely come out victorious from that deadly conflict!”…..”Abraham Lincoln is the best lawyer and the most honest man we have in Illinois.”~ Fifty Years in the Church of Rome.

After hearing this Chiniquy asked his two lawyers about this “Lincoln” and if he should seek his representation at the court in Urbana. They both answered: “Oh! if you can secure the services of Abraham Lincoln, by all means do it. We know him well; he is one of the best lawyers, and one of the most honest men we have in our State.” The priest sent an immediate telegraph to Lincoln asking to procure his services and within twenty minutes he had received the telegraphed answer:


European lack of free speech on WW2

May 8, 2018

My position is not to fall for human lies, but when there is a cover up I can smell that.

The USA: A goyim nation

April 29, 2018

The word “goy” or “goyim” comes from a Hebrew transliteration. It means “of the nations”, the nations being those divorced and divided at the Tower of Babel. Israel is not goy or gentile or a nation, but the people of YHVH: a special status. Israel being originally not a State but a term given to Jakob, the son of Isaac, which was the son of Abraham.

Normally we are told in the USA that the God of Abraham and Isaac and such created Divine Providence, giving the USA power of Divine Mandate and Manifest Destiny, and superior power over the natives and other foreigners. This portrays the National Mythology in a rather different light.

What’s the good news? Nobody here is under the 10 commandments! Pron is actually legitimate under ISIS/Ianna/Queen of Heaven, because it is considered “holy prostitution”. There’s probably more taxation and regulations of the marijuana, cigarette, and alcohol industry than there is on Hollywood movies and hardcore pron.

What is the bad news? It means the USA is actually under the dominion of something akin to the Prince of the Air or the God of this world. Or at least an equivalent power. During the  Tower of Babel, humans wanted to worship and follow other elohim. They declared war on the Most High and created the Tower of Babel to reach the heavens and strike fear into the Heavenly Court, the Divine Counsel.  Since the Most High respects free will, he gave humanity what we wanted. Now we live under the Authorities, the Deep State, and so on. Maybe people should have been careful what they demanded

<B>“The Rock, his work is perfect,
    for all his ways are justice.
A God of faithfulness and without iniquity,
    just and upright is he.
They have dealt corruptly with him;
    they are no longer his children because they are blemished;
    they are a crooked and twisted generation.
Do you thus repay the Lord,
    you foolish and senseless people?
Is not he your father, who created you,
    who made you and established you?
Remember the days of old;
    consider the years of many generations;
ask your father, and he will show you,
    your elders, and they will tell you.
When the Most High gave to the nations their inheritance,
    when he divided mankind,
he fixed the borders of the peoples
    according to the number of the sons of God.
But the Lord‘s portion is his people,
    Jacob his allotted heritage.</b>

This is like Human Alt History. The stuff they don’t tell us in public education. Wasn’t the story supposed to be that we fell from some Garden of Eden back when humans lived up to 1000 years? Hard to know what happened back that long ago. It is possible to determine if the Tower of Babel was an actual event. All we had to do is to follow the hypothesis. If all of us came from the same starting point and culture, then we would have myths and legends that would be almost the same except they would be in a different language.

The term “Sons of God” is used to refer to spirits, elohim, those who do not have physical bodies or who reside in a heavenly dimension rather than a physical dimension. Usually counsels are made out of 70s. 7 times 7 or 7 times 10 was often used to refer to a metaphorical context. For some reason, the number system runs on a base 7 instead of a base 2 (binary) or base 10 (our system). The sub unit (subordinates of archangels and elohim) leaders run on a base 10 or base 20 as each sub unit leader is a leader over 10 or 20. A Son of God also refers to someone that is given authority over their own divine family, such as the story of Jesus of Nazareth the Son of God, and thus Messiah/Lord of the Israelite tribes. Dividing the human nations up according to the number of the Sons of God, would imply that the Sons of God, also called Watchers, would become the rulers and authorities meant to Watch over and rule over these human tribes and nations.

On the idea of monotheism: it was not a concept people accepted back in 50 AD or 200 BC. That was something people made up later, centuries later. Almost all ancient societies had the concept of a pantheon: the father god, the mother goddess, which create a pantheon of similar entities. The Greeks had legends of Zeus copulating with mortal women, producing hybrid demi gods like Hercules. In fact, the Hebrew texts such as 1st Enoch, corroborates this story and says basically the same thing. The Garden of Eden term “seraph” can be interpreted as a flying burning serpent. Well, what is the depiction of an Eastern Dragon? A flying serpent, with feet, that breathes fire. They must have had the internet back then and copied each other’s artistic and legendary designs, right. Maybe not. None of these data points are conclusive in and of themselves, but they at least are clues tracing back to whether the Tower of Babel was a real event or not. The Sumerian and Hebrew texts often tell the exact same story: they just have opposing viewpoints, such as reading German/Japanese diaries vs American/British ones during WW2. I do not believe that the similarities are because the Japs “copied” American stuff during the war. I reject the theory that the Hebrews copied the Sumerian story because the Sumerian story is considered “older”. Of course papyrus doesn’t last as long as the Sumerian clay tablets. If the Hebrews had used metal plate etching, they would have older materials too. (If they did, somebody has probably stolen them already and melted them down for the gold by now)


They translated the Bible incorrectly: again

April 24, 2018

This has to do with the famous/infamous line from Jesus of Nazareth: love your enemies as you love yourself. It also includes the greatest commandment of the Old Testament summed up as: you will love your God with all your might, mind, and soul.

So what did they get wrong? They got the word love wrong.

The Greek word used in the New Testament is agape or phileo. Agape is used usually.

The original Hebrew word used in the Old Testament was something akin to Chesed. Chesed needed to be translated into Greek, so they used agape. Greek has 4 words for love. Eros being erotic or romantic/sexual love. Phileo being brotherly love, family love, comradeship (war buddies). Agape being an intellectual or spiritual love, freely chosen, based upon mutual respect. There was no Greek cultural term for Chesed because Greeks at the time had a totally alien culture compared to the Hebrews. So agape was chosen because it was the best fit.

So when secular readers of the Bible notice that the New Testament sounds a lot different than the Old Testament, they are correct. Jesus did not speak of love as we understand it. The Old Testament was not about love either. There is no mismatch there as would be the case for the Old Testament’s wars and executions vs the New Testament’s “love and non violence”.

Translating Eastern languages into Western and vice a versa is very difficult. Hebrew reads from right to left, just like Japanese does. Western languages read from left to right. It is why Japanese mangas read from the right panel to the left panel, then the bottom right panel, then the bottom left panel unlike Korean or Western comics. Japanese has a word for ai uchi, meaning two duelists kill each other in a single strike, ensuring mutual death and destruction. English doesn’t have a term for that, although we can describe it. That is because to the japanese, ai uchi was a skill that people could go for. If you are too weak to kill the enemy without dying, then you can at least take them down with you. We call that a Pyrhhic victory, but to the japanese it is often a good result or an intentional result, not a bad one. So how would you translate these Japanese term into English when English has neither the cultural context nor a word that describes the situation? What word we do have, Pyrhhic victory, is incomplete and has negative, not positive, connotations.

This illustrates some of the very alien differences between languages. When King James’ translators, none of which were given the authority of apostle or prophet, translated the Masoretic Hebrew text into English, they did the best they could, but they were merely human. Putting humans on pedestals is not a good idea for people will fall off it. Now just because part of the Masoretic text was corrupted by the scribes and the King James bible team make unintentonal mistakes, doesn’t mean the entire witness testimony from the Old and New Testaments are invalid. It just means as a mad scientist I should take a look at them and determine for myself what is Truth and what is False. It doesn’t matter if the entire world believes in A or disbelieves in B, I will take a look at them myself. There is no subject that cannot be mastered or proficiency obtained in. It only takes me 100 hours of study in a field to comprehend it enough to explain it to others. 10,000 hours are required for mastery. 1000 hours are required for proficiency: the skill level needed to do it at an amateur or professional level. The gain in knowledge and confidence between 1 hour and 100 hour is several magnitude of folds greater than the skill gained between 1000 hours and 5000 hours. It is a logarithmic curve that decreases exponentially as a person becomes more and more specialized in a field.

So what did Jesus ultimately mean when he said you must hate your father and mother before you become a disciple of Jesus? What did Jesus ultimately mean when he said you must love your enemies or your god?

You shall treat your enemies with the same respect and humane treatment as you would treat yourself. If you made a mistake or are responsible for evil, atone for it, thus give your enemies the same chance as you would give yourself. If you can kill yourself, then you can kill your enemies too. Respect for others does not mean treating them special as you would your lover or father or grandfather. The Father in the Heavens, the Father of Jesus, agrees with the existence of free will so that people can decide to love or not love the Father. Forcing someone to love a god at the expense of violating a divine command which is punished with Hell Fire in the Lake of Fire, is not love.

You must love your father and mother less if you wish to follow Jesus of Nazareth. You must love and value your life less, if you wish to follow in the path of a human leader that is going to make the entire world his enemy. If you value wealth, the world, or family more, then do not make the oath of allegiance to that leader, for that leader will become the Enemy of the World. At that time, your mother and father may become your enemies as well. For those that wish to avoid this consequence, do your own thing.

Does this mean The Father and the Son does not love certain humans? If the divine spirits have emotions like humans do, of course they can love and hate. But it was not the Plan of Salvation or War in scripture to make people feel an emotion that they did not, by threatening them with Hellfire. That was something the Vatican and other Religious Control systems created, to glory themselves and their New World Order powers.

Earth Marbles are photoshopped

April 16, 2018

The FBI’s 9/11 timeline

March 9, 2018

Recent DC fiasco isn’t the first time the FBI have done questionable things.

September 12, 2001: FBI and NTSB Limit Evidence Recovery Efforts at PentagonEdit event
FBI Special Agent John Adams, who is now in charge of evidence recovery at the Pentagon during the daytime, addresses how the FBI should deal with the physical evidence at the crash site. [CREED AND NEWMAN, 2008, PP. 347 AND 351] As the Pentagon is a crime scene, the FBI is responsible for collecting and documenting evidence there. [CREED AND NEWMAN, 2008, PP. 177] Agents are still carefully gathering together wreckage, but there is an overwhelming amount of it to deal with. Several FBI supervisors convene and discuss what the bureau should be recovering. One of them says every airplane part is significant and needs to be treated as valuable evidence. But Adams counters: “That can’t be. We know what happened here. Do we really need to collect every piece of the airplane?” Adams goes over to some National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) crash experts at the site, who are responsible for determining what happened to Flight 77. When he asks them, “Do you guys want pieces of the plane?” an NTSB official responds: “No, it’s clear what happened here. We don’t need pieces of the wings and stuff like that. But we do need the black boxes.” [CREED AND NEWMAN, 2008, PP. 351-352]

Entity Tags: RobertMoomo, Federal Bureau of Investigation, John S. Adams

Timeline Tags: Complete 911 Timeline

Category Tags: 9/11 Investigations, FBI 9/11 Investigation

(September 12, 2001-2002): FBI Intimidates Witnesses Who Saw Atta in Venice; Tells Them to Keep QuietEdit event
A number of witnesses who claim they saw Mohamed Atta living in Venice, Florida in early 2001 later allege that, in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, they are intimidated by the FBI and told to keep quiet about what they knew. Amanda Keller, who claims to have lived with Atta during early 2001 (see (February-April 2001)), later says that, even after she moved away from Venice, FBI agents called her every other day for several months after the attacks. She tells investigative reporter Daniel Hopsicker about “intimidation by the FBI” that she suffered, adding, “They told me not to talk to anybody, to keep my mouth shut.” Stephanie Frederickson, who remembers Keller and Atta living next door to her in the Sandpiper Apartments in Venice, later recalls, “At first, right after the attack, [the FBI] told me I must have been mistaken in my identification. Or they would insinuate that I was lying. Finally they stopped trying to get me to change my story, and just stopped by once a week to make sure I hadn’t been talking to anyone. Who was I going to tell? Most everyone around here already knew.” Charles Grapentine, the manager of the Sandpiper Apartments, also confirms Atta having lived with Keller. He says that, after 9/11, the FBI “called me a liar, and told me to keep my mouth shut.” [HOPSICKER, 2004, PP. 62-63, 65 AND 88-89] According to the FBI’s account of events, Atta had left Venice by late December 2000 or early January 2001. Its account makes no mention of him returning there later. [US CONGRESS, 9/26/2002] A former manager at Huffman Aviation, the Venice flight school attended by Atta in late 2000 (see July 6-December 19, 2000), also later alleges that the FBI intimidated him and told him to keep quiet. He says the FBI was “outside my house four hours after the attack.” He claims his phones were bugged after 9/11, and adds, “I thought these guys [Atta and his associates] were double agents. Why is that so incriminating?” [HOPSICKER, 2004, PP. 149-150]

Entity Tags: Daniel Hopsicker, Charles Grapentine, Mohamed Atta, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Stephanie Frederickson, Amanda Keller

Timeline Tags: Complete 911 Timeline

Category Tags: 9/11 Investigations, FBI 9/11 Investigation

September 12-October 29, 2001: Cars Belonging to 9/11 Hijackers Recovered; Suspicious Powder Found in Car Rented to AttaEdit event
On September 12, the FBI in Miami issues a national bulletin for law enforcement agencies to be on the lookout for two cars connected with the 9/11 attacks. One is a red 1989 Pontiac registered to Mohamed Atta, presumably the car he bought in July 2000 (see Early July 2000). The other is an Oldsmobile Alero, leased from a company in Boca Raton, but this is located later in the day. [WASHINGTON POST, 9/12/2001; WESH 2 (ORLANDO/DAYTONA), 9/12/2001; CNN, 9/13/2001] About six weeks later, the Pontiac and another unspecified car that belonged to Atta and Marwan Alshehhi are found at a used car dealership in Tamarac, Florida, near Fort Lauderdale. The hijackers reportedly sold them a week before 9/11. [CNN, 10/26/2001; CNN, 10/28/2001; MIAMI HERALD, 10/29/2001] Also around this time, Brad Warrick, the owner of a Florida company that rented cars to Atta (see August 6-September 9, 2001), reports finding about a teaspoon of an unidentified white powder in the trunk of a Ford Escort used by Atta in the days before the attacks. The FBI had impounded the car for two weeks after 9/11, and it has not been used since. An FBI spokeswoman says it is unlikely that agents would have missed a suspicious powder and suggests it could be fingerprinting dust. [MIAMI HERALD, 10/29/2001; REUTERS, 10/29/2001; WASHINGTON POST, 10/30/2001]

Entity Tags: Brad Warrick, Mohamed Atta, Federal Bureau of Investigation

Timeline Tags: Complete 911 Timeline

Category Tags: Mohamed Atta, 9/11 Investigations, FBI 9/11 Investigation

September 11, 2001-Autum 2002: FBI’s Saudi Office Fails to Follow Up Thousands of 9/11 Leads; Unprocessed Documents Are DestroyedEdit event
At the time of 9/11, the FBI’s Saudi Arabia office was comprised of only legal attache Wilfred Rattigan and his assistant Gamal Abdel-Hafiz. Abdel-Hafiz, the FBI’s only Muslim agent at the time, had been appointed to the position in February 2001 despite a controversy with his FBI work back in the US (see Early 1999-March 21, 2000). Some fellow FBI agents accused him of refusing to secretly record conversations with Muslim suspects. Time will report, “The FBI sent reinforcements [to the Saudi Arabian office] within two weeks of 9/11, but it appears that the bureau’s team never got on top of the thousands of leads flowing in from the US and Saudi governments.… According to several former employees of the US embassy in Riyadh, the FBI legal attache’s office housed within the embassy was often in disarray during the months that followed 9/11. When an FBI supervisor arrived [nearly a year after 9/11] to clean up the mess, she found a mountain of paper and, for security reasons, ordered wholesale shredding that resulted in the destruction of unprocessed documents relating to the 9/11 investigations.” In June 2005, the Senate Judiciary Committee will begin investigating allegations that the FBI’s Saudi office was “delinquent in pursuing thousands of leads” related to 9/11. Piles of time-sensitive leads still had not been followed up when the supervisor arrives. The FBI will claim that the thousands of shredded documents were duplicated elsewhere. But the Judiciary Committee will assert some material is lost. One employee will claim that some of the lost information “was leads, suspicious-activity material, information on airline pilots.” Rattigan, who has converted to Islam, later will sue the FBI for discrimination and will claim that the FBI refused to provide him with adequate resources to cope with the workload after 9/11. [FRONTLINE, 10/16/2003; TIME, 6/27/2005]

Nathiel Grisby on Democrats

December 17, 2017


Lieut Nathaniel “Natty” Grigsby

It’s like Socrates, giving a prophecy when he was being sentenced to death. Prophecy came true btw, more or less. (Same thing I wrote 2015)