If Bruce Lee could find synergy between martial arts and dancing, then why not music too for the rest of us?
Courtesy of Grim Beorn’s post.
If Bruce Lee could find synergy between martial arts and dancing, then why not music too for the rest of us?
Courtesy of Grim Beorn’s post.
Families must be restructured to feudal or clan lines if one wishes to promote individual liberty and security from the bottom up.
This habit of relying upon the feds or some outside force to interfere in your own issues, is part of the problem, not the solution. When you don’t defend yourself, the person that has the power to save you, is also your slave master. There’s nothing stopping them, given the power imbalance.
Of course, feudal or clan lines merely requires one thing, a hierarchy, it doesn’t require a change in cultural or social values.
For a prototypical clan head, the male is it, sometimes the female is instead.
The male patriarch handles the hierarchy for the males, the females handle the hierarchy for the females, with some cross over due to age or authority.
Presupposing 3 males, 3 females, we have this structure.
Clan Patriarch 45 years old
Clan heir male 20 years old
Clan second male 15 years old
Clan Matriarch 45 years old
Clan third oldest 14 years old
Clan fourth oldest 12 years old
The second oldest male cannot be commanded by the third or fourth oldest, the age gap is too wide and they aren’t even in the same hierarchy or chain of command, necessarily. But the matriarch can command the second oldest male with authority equal to the patriarch, mostly.
The heir commands protects the second oldest male, forming a fraternal relationship similar to feudal relations. Protection in exchange for obedience and loyalty, honor for honor, love for love, obedience for security. The second oldest male then has his own responsibilities, he commands the third and fourth oldest. The third oldest, in the absence of any higher authority, is responsible for the guidance, protection, and safety of the fourth oldest.
Many US families are a de facto dictatorship. Extremely weak to insurgents or other attackers that prioritize hitting vulnerabilities and soft targets. A feudal system is not as “soft”, even the Japanese aristocrats, the samurai lineages, had their women train in the naginata for home defense. The women were objectively inferior to the males in the Japanese hierarchy, however, but that doesn’t stop them.
Btw, in a modern world, it wouldn’t necessarily matter if the heir was male. The designated heir, oldest scion, could be female as well. And they would have the same feudal responsibilities as a male heir.
In order to reinforce the chain of command and the loyalty of subordinates, special names and marks are used to designate one’s proper rank in the hierarchy. This rank is then reinforced when every member of the hierarchy recognizes who is above them and who is below them. Just like a very stable dog and wolf pack. Once the hierarchy is confirmed, violence reduces to almost nothing, everything else is handled via social reform and pressure. The males set an example as the protector of their families, so that their younger sisters can take as an example of what masculine qualities they would like to find in a husband. The younger sisters obey their brothers and help keep the family traditions alive with food culture or some other thing.
The issue of personal freedom usually comes into conflict, but given the social metamorphosis of the 21st century, most of that can be re-engineered. America has a black traitor on the Throne whipping whites and blacks around as a traitor King. Don’t tell me social norms can’t be modified, they certainly can be if the Will is there. Most people are gutless though. That’s what the hierarchy is, to force people to learn how to take responsibility and care for those weaker than them, while obeying those with stronger authorities of a proper nature.
The older family members are trained and conditioned to place their lives at risk to protect the youngest.
Thus even a 13 or 11 year old male is expected to jump in front of a rabid dog to shield his little sister or brother.
Insane and harsh? Perhaps. Warrior training, though, it qualifies. Better protection against pedos than the others, especially the ones in the family.
Because yes, the uncle can come in and scoop up some children for his fun, like Hollywood and Demoncrats do. But first they have to go through the direct superiors of those children, for those superiors will be watching their subordinates like a hawk. After all, without someone to obey them, they are just the gophers of their older brothers and sisters, appendages of their fathers and mothers. Parasites, helpless parasites. The motivation to change themselves, to become stronger and better humans, comes from the deepest depths of their heart. It cannot come from a dictatorship at the top suppressing dissent and Ordering People to Obey.
I sometimes say that the scientific geniuses were considered nuts by their so called peers. And for good reason.
“When a true genius appears in this world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him.” – Jonathan Swift
Many on the Left like to de-construct popular or traditional perspectives on individuals with an effect on history.
But they aren’t the only ones with that trick up their sleeve, so to speak. So on this topic, there are 3 links which tell significantly different stories about the same event and the man behind it.
Some key passages I thought were worth reading:
Recently I attended a public consultation held by the Australian government to address racism. This was part of its strategy to make Australia a true multicultural country.
What stood out to me was that the majority of attendees contributing to this public consultation were all migrant lobbyists, left-wing radicals, political Islamists. There were very few representatives from the domestic population who had different perspectives.
Suggestions made at the public consultation included changes to our law, the constitution, various Acts, changes to the schools curriculum, further Affirmative Action policies in the workplace, etc.
Disinformation and lies were spread. They wanted the media to not report on ethnic violence and crime and have more ‘positive’ stories about the migrant community. One muslim participant claimed ‘Australians’ didn’t want to live in ‘ethnic’ areas because they perceived them to be dangerous. A lot don’t perceive them to be dangerous, they know they are, especially for the despised Anglo majority.
That evening I watched a documentary about the massacre Andre Breivik is responsible for. It was truly heart wrenching to see the massive number of people Andre Breivik killed.
After attending this anti-racism consultation it also hit home to me the sheer frustration so many people are feeling. Key decisions are being made by radicals and special interest groups.
At one point at the public consultation I got into a disagreement with another white lady about whether the point that criticising religion is not the same as vilifying a person because of their race. This was to prevent political islamists from getting their way and banning the criticism of Islam. She wanted me to note that not everyone at the table agreed. After the session ended this lady started to talk about her private life and announced she was gay with a minority partner.
I was gobsmacked. As a gay woman she either didn’t understand under Sharia Law gays get executed. We were trying to protect her and she was fighting us. Days later I told another gay acquaintance about this story and she immediately started to stand up for Islam, announcing that SOME Christians would also executed gays if they could.
As far as I am aware only Islamic countries ruled by Sharia Law execute gays. I’m not aware of any gays being executed by Christian states.
I have started to understand why when there are regime changes certain people get rounded up and incarcerated; it is just out of sheer frustration of the damage they have done by pushing their ignorant and radical agendas and not listening to what other people are saying or learning the facts.
So much of my life has been adversely affected by Multiculturalism and enforced diversity. I got completely brainwashed as a young woman and spent years being politically correct and tolerant only to find it was a one way street.
A lot of young people end up on the left and I blame the fact they are indoctrinated in school and then by the university system. This is why Andre Breivic’s massacre of these kids is so sad and needless. They were victims of a system that wasn’t teaching them to think using the facts, but to take the facts and wrap them around an ideology.
I wonder how many of those murdered kids would’ve ended up seeing through the indoctrination and emerged as a strong voice against the left. David Horowitz who actively speaks out against the left was once on the side of communists. Ayaan Hirsi Ali was once a devote Muslim who wore a niqab and she completely transformed her worldview. People change their worldview.
There are moves to already curtail debate on all of this. During this public consultation the participants called for action against overseas websites that are influencing the Australian population, I guess sites like Jihad Watch, AmRen etc., We can’t debate this openly in Australia and if these people have their way we won’t be able to discuss it online. The only places left will be the ‘whispering corners’.
They can enslave the people of Australia so effectively because the citizens gave up their guns, their power, and thus sold their souls for some material benefits. Which won’t last given the Islamic and Leftist hordes. You can take that as my personal bias in all this.
The post at Amren had this to say about what Brevik claims he is fighting against:
There you have a liberal coming as close as they are likely to get to an admission of what they all fear: that Breivik’s views (although not his actions) are shared by large numbers of people, especially his views on immigration and Islam. Prof Eriksen is wrong in one respect: it is not a “dangerous minority” but humans generally who have these feelings, including, as mentioned previously, liberals. People may have been brainwashed but that does not means normal human instincts have vanished or that people generally believe in the propaganda. Instead people develop a fear response which drives them to shun views which clash with the ideology and to give evidence of their belief in the ideology in public situations by paying lip service to it.
While an ideology can be enforced, the public will display behaviours ranging from a servile adherence to the ideology to promote their interests to lip service just to remain safe. But once the means of enforcing the ideology are removed these behaviours will rapidly vanish. The societies liberals have built in the West are houses of cards just waiting to be knocked over if the stranglehold of the politically correct can be broken.
Why? Simply because the real innovators and geniuses are the ones that society thinks are crazy and will often exile or isolate in order to maintain the flawed status quo.
But since results can convince even the most retarded of fools that something can be profitable, eventually society comes to pretend that it always accepted things like the Wright Brother’s flight experiment or electricity.
Society does not generally do that, because those things are strange and foreign to the accepted wisdom of the time. The accepted wisdom of the time is pretty dumb, when all is said and done.
So when people use the propaganda programmed command lines of the Left in saying the “science is settled”, only fake scientists would ever believe that kind of science.
When discussing the merits of whether Jonestown was a good comparison for current modern day Democrat or Leftist obedience to evil, something old was unearthed.
The second was a particular type of psychological coercion described in Deborah Layton’s very fine and highly recommended book Seductive Poison. I am describing this from memory (I read the book many years ago), but my recollection is that they were encouraged to inform on each other if they heard anyone complain about or criticize Jones or Jonestown. The tattler was then publicly praised, while the complainer was subject to public harangues, physical punishment, withdrawal of privileges, and ostracism. In a totally controlled environment, this was especially difficult to take, even for those with strong personalities.
What was even more terrible—and diabolical—was the fact that Jones made some of his close confederates pretend to be be discontented, confiding their criticism of Jones and Jonestown to others. The listeners had no idea that these were false “confessions.” If they listened sympathetically and perhaps shared their own discontent, they were reported and punished. But worse, if they failed to report the confidences of their “friends”—who were actually, unbeknownst to them, Jim Jones plants—then they were punished as well.
The entire system encouraged extreme distrust of sharing any complaints with or confiding in anyone. Therefore no mass rebellion or escape plans could be hatched. A resident never knew who was telling the truth, or who would go straight to Jones with the news. Even those who hated Jones and Jonestown had to wrestle with their consciences about whether to report on a friend; the consequences for failure to do so could be dire.-Neo
So to summarize, Neo said Jonestown was not a good comparison because Jonestown had brainwashing methods designed for a prison camp. And such details were provided in bold, above, on an older post about Jim Jones, the Leftist crusader.
What I immediately noticed, because psychological warfare and propaganda manipulation has become a necessity for me to study and master, is how closely it resembled the florist and Christian baker scenarios.
A homo couple entered a Christian bakery and then taped the refusal to design wedding cakes for an extremist and non socially accepted gathering. The florist was confronted by her “friends” when it came time to talk about obedience to Hussein Obola and the Gaystapo. The florist refused to comply with the expected results from her “friends”. Such events are designed to chill the resistance.
America the culture of the gun, as known overseas to foreigners, pro or anti American alike.