Starbucks New CEO Directive on Guns

To be clear: we do not want these events in our stores. Some anti-gun activists have also played a role in ratcheting up the rhetoric and friction, including soliciting and confronting our customers and partners.

Am I perhaps the only one that thinks if it wasn’t for the anti gun activists harassing the customers (a known union and thug technique), the CEO might not have much of a problem with people holding their private events in their affiliated stores?

Also the common counter propaganda line I see is that the organizations did not have an agreement with Starbucks to hold their meetings. While they may not have had agreement with the CEO, Starbucks stores aren’t run by the CEO. Who is to say that individual agreements weren’t made between store owners and affiliates?

That in fact, this directive is to force Starbucks’ own employees to toe the line, in order to appease anti gun activists.

Americans are so soft some communist agit prop will make them bend knee. Just imagine what actual threats and Islamic violence would do. They are so weak, I don’t think they even deserve to exist, profit or no profit.

Explore posts in the same categories: Politics, violence

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: