The original members of the Leftist alliance were basically insurgents/terrorists or wannabe revolutionaries that sought to the change the world, if only because they could not change themselves for the better.
For those that sought to change the world, it became more and more of an excuse to avoid changing themselves. If environmentalists can change the world and make people do things their way, then faithful zealots won’t have to pay attention to the fact that they couldn’t change themselves to help the environment. No matter what evil they committed or who they railroaded, they began to tell themselves that it would be justified so long as they made an impact on the world.
If there’s something you cannot do as a human, something about yourself that you hate and wish to change, but either cannot or fail in the doing… even then you can still get a gun, point it at the head of another human, and make them do what you could not. This is called “changing the world”, in so far as another human is a separate existence from yourself, thus external along with the world.
The Leftist alliance’s chosen model of totalitarian tyranny and a slave economy was perfect for their existence. After all, the whole idea of controlling people is to force them to change their ways. It is mutually opposed to the concept of individualism and freedom, where it says one’s duty is to change oneself and ONLY that.
Grim asked about the Left’s logistic supply chains in order to disrupt operations. While I gave a simple chain, it was simple to the point of almost inaccuracy. First, the breakdown of the existing model and its lack of detail.
taxes -> gov -> unions -> Democrat politicians -> Leftist alliance special groups
1. The Leftist alliance is composed of a thousand to 1 million special groups, their own faction often times run almost completely with self sufficiency from an ideological point of view. They don’t “take orders” from other Leftist totalitarian factions. They cooperate much as the 13 Colonies did against a common enemy, only through being “united states”.
2. This is not so much a chain as it is a circle. A perpetual Ourobos circle of self-replenishment. Once established, it needs nothing apart from itself. It is neither male nor female, thus reproduces by itself, on itself, and needs no external good, evil, light, darkness, food, or existence to sustain itself. This is what I meant by the Left has established a self-regenerating supply chain. Thus:
taxes -> gov -> unions -> Democrat politicians -> Leftist alliance special groups -> taxes -> gov -> …..
Grim mentioned the Republican tactical and strategic initiative to cut down on taxes, increase economic growth, improved limited government, etc as a solution. First of all, the GOP didn’t intend to break the Left’s power, back, or logistics. Thus they can’t fail at what they didn’t try. They just didn’t try it. Secondly, even if the government is forced to reduce tax revenues by 10%, that is not the majority of their revenue or war funding. The gov also prints money, out of thin air. The war funding source isn’t negated by cuts of that nature, in some ways Leftist power increases when government is forced to shutdown or have its funding cut.
Gov -> unions -> Democrat politicians -> Leftist alliance members -> print money -> gov.
The government protects and empowers unions. Unions support politicians. Politicians make laws that allow Leftist alliance members to operate in printing more money that goes back to the gov.
The other method the government uses is this.
-10% taxes -> government funding decrease – > Democrat politicians produce corrupt deals -> Leftist alliance benefits = decrease in military funding, funding of Republican colleges, and funding in disfavored bureaucratic factions in DC. This in turn leads to basically -10% taxes -> increase in power of Democrat politicians. By being the one that controls the redistribution of resources, they force those other factions in their alliance to obey even harder. Those other factions don’t necessarily need to be in their alliance either, as GOP leaders are convinced by Democrat money as well. Union money. Printed money. Tax revenues. Social security fund raiding too.
This doesn’t mean Democrat=GOP. In terms of simplistic math sum theory, Leftist alliance > Democrats > GOP. In short, Democrats are smaller and part of Leftist alliance, which is greater and more powerful than the GOP, which is less than the Democrats. This power equation has sometimes changed over the course of US history, but not by much.
The method they have used the most is probably social security fund raiding. Whenever Republicans decreased taxes and state/federal level alliance factions had to cut back, they relied more and more heavily on the federal Democrat faction's war chest of social security funding, conveniently provided to them by FDR.
This is like killing an insurgent when the enemy has 1 million more cannonfodder children ready to send to the front lines to die for Jihad. You're not really accomplishing as much as you think you are on the strategic and logistic level. Tactically, sure it feels like a victory, but only tactically.
All the actions of the Leftist alliance, whether one wants to talk about homosexual activism, Mexican immigration, labor laws, minimum wage, corporation taxes, high school and college education "curriculums", public and private unions, US spending on defense, domestic security, and local state boondocks… it's all interconnected in a web and a circle of logistics.
The Left's vast resources have become so interconnected, and full of regenerative capabilities, that even if you took out one node or one faction's entire war capability, the others will flood in and fill up the gap, defend the fallen faction until the fallen faction recovers. Think "safe harbors" in COIN. Middle East "Cease fires".
The only thing that would likely take it down would be a full frontal purge and total war deployment committing 90+% of your side's full military/economic capability: a last ditch attack/stand. But then that can just as well be called a civil war or a nuclear holocaust, because that's the kind of damage that would have to be inflicted to shatter the enemy's morale as well as supply source.
I believe the correct path in life is not to change the world as oh so many brainwashed cannon fodder journalist degree factories advocated we should do. Instead, people should strive to their utmost, putting their life on the line, to change themselves for the better. Only then, not before, will they ever receive the ability, power, and right to change the world.
A substitute for the difficult work of changing yourself is changing other people through the mere ability to force the world, and its people, to be remodeled upon a special brand of social justice. However, how can evil bastards ever know what is just for society?
Those that refuse to accept the existence of the Left’s evil, certainly won’t be able to do anything to change the world. For the Left has already accepted that their enemies, you people, will need to be exterminated and enslaved to pave the way for a new Man Made God powered Utopia of Perfect Resolutions. Until people change themselves for the better, they will not deserve victory against the Left. Nor can our side make them change, that is the job of the Left. Mao once wrote that insurgents are fish that swim amongst the people, that need the support of the people. If the people will not support you, then merely wait and engineer for the occupation to change the people for you, by burning them alive if necessary. Such is the nature of war, especially with or against the Left.