Archive for the ‘Psychology’ category

Yin and Yang

July 19, 2014

Some people must constantly wonder how these concepts even apply to the modern life of a Westerner.

Well, for me, yin is me doing this for several years while ignoring Hussein between 2008-2012.

http://cheezburger.com/tag/Cats/page/2

Oh wait, that’s the funny wrong gif.

https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20140718215135AABk3Xp

I answer questions and help people out. That’s yin.

And if I can’t do that, I find something to smash, break, and destroy or bite people’s heads off while online. That’s yang, applied strength and force to overcome the World Itself.

When things are unbalanced, go for the opposite. Then swirl it together, mix it, and you got something of an interesting drink concoction there.

Autobiographical manifesto review of mass murderer Santa Barbara

May 29, 2014

It’s a good narration and the author is someone I’ve checked on to verify the strength of his rationality.

http://neoneocon.com/2014/05/26/murder-in-santa-barbara/

This is a second view of the same incident.

Rod boy there, our grand villain of the week, is a weakling. There have been plenty of people under more strain than he is, but he and other people seem to think he was in pain. Compared to his targets or to other humans, who have exceeded their limits for higher callings, Rod’s life was average.

Instead of taking the leadership role and the role of the senior, over his sister and his brother, he allowed his own weakness and his family’s Hollywood moral weaknesses, to do him in. As a result, he self destructed and he is no longer a problem, for anyone. With the internet, anyone with savant level or genius level abilities, as he thought he had, should have been able to figure this out in 10 or so years. All he did was play World of Warcraft, snickers.

Manifesto of Californian Hollywood Normality

May 25, 2014

That was a pretty cryptic title, but it’s mostly about mass murderers.

(click on the lower right hand button to view in full screen)

Hilarious manifesto, I read most of the last half. Judging by a bit of corroboration in the news reports, the details given in the manifest are correct, such as the murderer refusing to speak to his sister’s boyfriend. That may just be the 99% truth to hide the 1% deception, but it’s good to have confirmation via independent sources. Presumably independent.

So here we have a… person who wants to kill his sister because he’s jealous of his siblings. He thinks he is God, a divine entity that punishes the guilty. Like Dexter or something. His father is a big Hollywood producer or some smuck high up. Hollywood has raised enormous funds for the Leftist alliance’s war on humanity. How, poetic, that this ended up influencing one of their valuable scions to go ballistic on other rich families.

No paste and copy at scribd. Humanity is a disgusting, wretched, depraved species. If I had it in my power I would stop at nothing to reduce every single one of you to mountains of skulls and rivers of blood and rightfully so. You deserve to be annihilated and I will give that to you. You never showed me any mercy so I will show you none.

As I’ve come to learn more about humanity and its flaws, it truly does look more disgusting and wretched. I don’t believe in humanity as a species. I believe in the potential of humanity itself. That may be a rather copy pasted remark from another author’s words, but it will have to suffice. I have seen for myself valor, honor, dignity, liberty, and strength in individual humans. The species itself may be hopeless and full of 68% evil, but that is why it is so exceptional that there are individuals who don’t let the crabs pull them down. The murderer of our little story here, never did meet a single person like that. Not a single one. He grew up in the Hollywood, Leftist, culture, why would he ever meet one? All they have are zombies, child rapists, Polanskis, gun runners in California, and supporters/Obamacans of Hussein O and Eric (Justice is not blind, for I am her eyes) Holder .

The price of enlightenment and knowledge is pain, despair, and hate: hating the very thing one valued and loved. The Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil is not merely an allegory for me, for I’ve seen it in the lives of humanity itself.

The murderer in our final story would have been a good Islamic Jihad convert. Virgins in heaven, using jihad to kill infidels, it’s pretty much the same thing.

(side stepping to a different topic)

The conditioning used on soldiers to make them obey orders to pull the trigger and kill, is mostly using game feedback to reinforce the consequence of accuracy on target with immediate reward, and punish bad actions such as shooting friendlies or hostages with punishment. This makes it into a semi automatic decision, where people are not pulling triggers on humans, but merely targets, scoring points, etc. If the shooter lacks a justification afterwards, guilt and PTSD hits. But this training allows people to distance themselves from the act, allowing them to pull the trigger without hesitation, in most of the cases. In WWII, there was a lot of rumours that most people didn’t even fire their weapons. The training was different. What is seen in this manifesto is the obverse selection. The actor removed himself from humanity itself, he did not remove humanity from his targets. That is interesting, but as a consequence there are no “safeties” on that kind of conditioning (violent conditioning).

The natural hesitation of humans when it comes to killing humans has to do with our desire for love, comraderie, and social acceptance. We don’t kill, because we fear being hurt and killed ourselves in return. If we remove even ourselves from being human… the sky is the limit to what one can do, free of social restrictions. It will then answer the Ultimate Question posed by Socrates.

I would rather die having spoken in my manner, than speak in your manner and live. For neither in war nor yet in law ought any man use every way of escaping death. For often in battle there is no doubt that if a man will throw away his arms, and fall on his knees before his pursuers, he may escape death, if a man is willing to say or do anything. The difficulty, my friends, is not in avoiding death, but in avoiding unrighteousness; for that runs deeper than death.——Socrates before the Athenian Democratic Utopia

Without social restrictions and social morality dictating what a person does, is that person Good or Evil? If we presume to exclude God and the Devil from the picture, and the temptations of the snake con artist, how would a person decide what is Good and Just without external influences?

Socrates made one decision. The murderer makes another. People who hate humanity’s flaws, as I do, would never forgive humans for their evil, just as Plato never forgave humanity and its politics for the death of his sensei, Socrates. But it is the very existence of Socrates, those who society commands to be evil, and yet can refuse in the presence of Death itself to obey evil, that makes a difference for us. There are people like that, for real, living amongst humanity. The truly righteous, those who are on the side of justice, even if everyone around them demands that evil be done. The 3% who fought for freedom in the American Revolution, before it was popular and risk free. The geniuses and Cassandras that are always rejected, misunderstood, and disbelieved. Human history is really a history of these 3% pulling the rest of us along. People in the modern 21st century may benefit from microwaves, economic logistics, and science, but they never built any of that. They contributed 0, to the advancement of human ingenuity and progress.

The murderer fell into despair when he thought society itself was evil and that no one was strong enough in society to resist temptation and evil. Not even himself. He had no role models. The one he constructed of females, fell apart. It may have been saved by one virtuous woman, but he saw none in Hollywood and California (no surprise). So he just self destructed, taking as many people with him as he could. For such a pathetic example of “humanity”, he couldn’t even get as many as Ft. Hood 1′s Hasan did. Whether this is tragic, comedic, or just a downright hilarious waste of resources, will depend on your personal taste.

I’ve seen far worse. This is little more than theater to me. Californian and Hollywood theater at that.

The Left’s War on Humanity: The Women Front

May 24, 2014

http://neoneocon.com/2014/05/22/the-returned/#comment-781550

My assessment made there, is this:

While people here (Neo Neocon’s place) should already know this, I’ll repeat the very obvious.

The Democrats scare women with their War on Women rhetoric, by picking on the fear of being raped and helpless. They convince women that if REpublicans win, Democrats will not be able to protect women from rape or unwanted pregnacies. That’s the leverage, the fear, that keeps the slaves in line. Because it isn’t enough to vote one’s conscience, one must vote against the Republicans in that scenario. One can’t merely take a pass and live one’s life under that kind of fear.

In order to reinforce the fear of the punishment, Democrats help blacks and other criminals disarm the population, rape more women, and cause rape on campus to skyrocket due to drinking. With this, they can truly leverage women’s fear, because once a woman has been raped by one of the Left’s operations, that woman will have even more reason to stick to the Democrats that promise protection. Hence Stockholme S achieved. The chain that is invisible is set.

If a person meets a Democrat or a Leftist, and is not sickened to the core of their soul, about to throw up or attack the evil, they don’t truly understand what the Left is and they don’t truly feel hate in their hearts. True hate is not merely choosing chocolate over vanilla. True hate is being sickened by all ice cream merely because one hates the color and sight of vanilla. Those that think they have great emotional control because they can be bipartisan with Democrats, that they can talk to their Democrat friends, while they “hate” the politics: that it is a great act of self control. It’s a limited act of self control, because the emotion they are controlling is very mild.

While kidnappers and torturers control one person and manipulate one person’s mind, the Left manipulates hundreds of millions. Whether there’s any moral difference or ethical difference, I can’t say, other than that the Left is worse.

P.S. Another front, the science fiction writers of America, produced this bit of theater/evidence. http://voxday.blogspot.com/2012/10/john-scalzi-is-rapist.html

Notice how Scalzi wrote that just before an election, directed against a certain demographic, with “trigger” warnings.

Empathy in Sociopaths

April 16, 2014

“There are two kinds of empathy,” says James Fallon, a neuroscientist at the University of California and author of The Psychopath Inside: A Neuroscientist’s Personal Journey into the Dark Side of the Brain. “Cognitive empathy is the ability to know what other people are feeling, and emotional empathy is the kind where you feel what they’re feeling.” Autistic people can be very empathetic – they feel other people’s pain – but are less able to recognise the cues we read easily, the smiles and frowns that tell us what someone is thinking. Psychopaths are often the opposite: they know what you’re feeling, but don’t feel it themselves. “This all gives certain psychopaths a great advantage, because they can understand what you’re thinking, it’s just that they don’t care, so they can use you against yourself.” (Chillingly, psychopaths are particularly adept at detecting vulnerability. A 2008 study that asked participants to remember virtual characters found that those who scored highly for psychopathy had a near perfect recognition for sad, unsuccessful females, but impaired memory for other characters.)

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/books/10737827/Psychopaths-how-can-you-spot-one.html

Good old empathy, a lot of uses for this.

To Change Yourself

January 23, 2014

http://www.joyhacks.com/happiness/unusual-happiness-theory/

http://www.bookwormroom.com/2014/01/20/happiness-is-a-moral-obligation-says-dennis-prager/

There’s been some interesting articles recently on this topic of personal happiness and the pursuit thereof.

I think there’s two options people have: change themselves or change the world (other people). Leaders are mostly about taking up a position of authority to change the world and its people for some goal or purpose. Psychologists often tell you to change yourself, but that’s more to fit in with society’s rules than for any personal benefit to you.

When I speak of changing myself, I am speaking of making myself more resistant to evil and more resistant to mind control (propaganda). In so far as you should pursue your strengths instead of shoring up your weaknesses, try to pursue activities that improve your spine, your courage, your independence abilities, etc. Virtues come from personal experience and accomplishment. If you want to fix your weaknesses while doing good things, find a way to make your own self the goal of your projects. Instead of looking at society and considering how best to conform to the rules of Authorities, think about how to self direct your own evolution and adaptation instincts.

http://www.bookwormroom.com/2014/01/22/finding-your-spark-of-genius/

If you like this topic of self change, read the 3 articles linked here, they are very interesting background related to the central issue.

Obedience to Evil: Totalitarian Tyranny in Motion

January 2, 2014

http://nymag.com/news/features/chaneya-kelly-2014-1/index.html

“Did Your Father Touch You?”
“No.”
“No.”
“No.”
“Yes.”
She’s regretted the lie that sent him to prison ever since.

Once you obey evil, your soul essentially self destructs. Then the state will take over what is left, for all of eternity.

Old Socrates was right in more ways than one.

I would rather die having spoken in my manner, than speak in your manner and live. For neither in war nor yet in law ought any man use every way of escaping death. For often in battle there is no doubt that if a man will throw away his arms, and fall on his knees before his pursuers, he may escape death, if a man is willing to say or do anything. The difficulty, my friends, is not in avoiding death, but in avoiding unrighteousness; for that runs deeper than death.-Socrates before the Athenian death panel

Authority: What’s it good for

December 27, 2013

http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/12/23/taking-life-into-your-own-hands/?ref=health&_r=0

Authority is not always a bad thing. Meaning its mere existence is what has made human cooperation and civilization feasible.

Why is that? Merely because it prevents panic, it creates a meritocracy on the spot that puts the most confident, presumably also the most competent, person in charge of affairs. As humans who feel lack of confidence won’t take action, just like CPR in public.

Of course family and the authority of the patriarch also helps, on a cellular basis for self organization, but civilizations don’t have patriarchs standing on the corner all the time telling their clans what to do. That’s not modern civilization, at least not modern Western civilization.

From my experience, most people won’t step up and take a leadership position in a crowd of strangers or people they don’t know. Especially if they have doubts about their own power or ability. They will gladly step up and do a job, such as call 911 or perform CPR, but only when someone in their face tells them, “you, I need you to do X”. When it is phrased in the minds of people that “someone should call 911″ or “should needs to perform CPR”, then No One does.

P.S.

Often the cultural, social, and legal forms for wives and husbands designated the man as the leader, as the authority, because someone has to be the leader. There can’t be two co equal leaders always arguing about the same thing, that would ignite warfare. As it already has in the West, between the sexes. In matriarchies, the woman was the leader. But in no human society has there ever been a case where two people have equal responsibilities and equal authority, who didn’t try to kill each other eventually to figure out who the top dog was.

The Good Old Days of America

December 24, 2013

1930s infiltration of American institutions and branches of power in:

School of Darkness by Bella Dodd told an interesting story, but now we have other sources that tell a similar kind of story.

http://voluntarysociety.org/conditioning/misc/peoplespottage.html

A lot concerning American civic duties and virtues in that open essay formatted website. Also a story about how it all went away before any of us were born in the good old US.

Easy slide show to show the slide into Totalitarian Evil.

Learn about mind control or conversational hypnosis. It’s very important.

http://www.kickthemallout.com/article.php/Video-Darren_Brown_Mind_Control

This is connected to subconscious hypnotic conversational techniques, Pick Up Artist dating and sex amplification techniques, and even the whole Creative vs Social Authority piece I wrote before this one.

I’ve never heard of this Darren Brown before or services he has been associated with. My research on mind control started with PUA community, or rather Pick Up Artist communities.

The Left is just creating more slave fodder for the coming war in Harvard.

Authoritarian regimes: Feminist Agendas

December 17, 2013

http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303615304579157900127017212

In Japan, most of these issues would be disciplined, resolved, and moderated by the actual students, who have the most to lose. In the US, it is authoritarian straight on down from the President of the school. That’s some micro there.

The article spends a lot of time on getting the kangaroo court procedures down, but that’s not what I’m primarily interested in. What I’m interested in is how Strange’s girlfriend “freaked out”.

This gives a hint to me that she has been conditioned in her past. By what? A former boyfriend? Female feminist hypnotists that implanted false memories? Prior experience with rape and/or porn emulation? Strange distanced himself from her, locking himself in a room and sending the keys down to her. That may seem natural or the right decisoin, but I think that’s the wrong decision. One of the only ways to deprogram and de-condition people who have been whipped as dogs and conditioned the way Skinner conditioned his rats, is to physically bond with them. To transfer your emotional calmness to them via physical touch, when words alone do nothing. Good intention on Strange’s part, but leaving her alone like that would automatically mean her conditioning and whoever was pulling her strings (like the school feminists) would have ultimate power over her.

A lot of what people do in that situation, such as the false accusations, are what they do because they obey their authority. And their authority isn’t you, the male or boyfriend, but the Leftist Totalitarian Regime and their reps. Some do it for revenge or greed, but many just do it because they were ordered to do so. Because they were commanded to do so by society, because this is “right”, and so forth. Those that lack a spine and an integrated self identity, are very vulnerable to being “told what to do”.

Strange, by giving his girlfriend space… ultimately merely lost control of her and access to her. If you have no control over your partner’s actions and if you have no say in her behavior, even though you care the most for her out of all the strangers around you two… nothing good will result. When she is given to the control and authority of those who will use her up as another tool in the Regime’s war.

Women, like men, can be conditioned similar to how animals are conditioned and trained. This is called dehumanization or rather demoting someone from a human that uses free will to an animal that can be controlled. In situations where your spouse, male or female, cannot control themselves, you can’t treat them as human. Somebody has demoted them. YOu need to first promote them, break them of the shackles of slavery first, before your words can do anything good.

Remember the Manson murders? How did he gain authority over so many young girls that males of this generation cannot gain, even though he was an evil Fer? Why are the ones in authority, always the evil and the ones who treat humans as cattle and as slaves? Because those who care for your lover, refuses to control them, refuses the throne of power, refuses the Authority and all that it means, because they want to treat their lover as an Equal.

I’m sorry to say this, but a person that has been tortured and conditioned for years by the Left… isn’t your equal. They won’t behave the way you expect them to.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.