Watching Ace of Diamond makes baseball make a lot more sense. Moving fastball with cutters.
Archive for the ‘Psychology’ category
Some people must constantly wonder how these concepts even apply to the modern life of a Westerner.
Well, for me, yin is me doing this for several years while ignoring Hussein between 2008-2012.
Oh wait, that’s the funny wrong gif.
I answer questions and help people out. That’s yin.
And if I can’t do that, I find something to smash, break, and destroy or bite people’s heads off while online. That’s yang, applied strength and force to overcome the World Itself.
When things are unbalanced, go for the opposite. Then swirl it together, mix it, and you got something of an interesting drink concoction there.
It’s a good narration and the author is someone I’ve checked on to verify the strength of his rationality.
This is a second view of the same incident.
Rod boy there, our grand villain of the week, is a weakling. There have been plenty of people under more strain than he is, but he and other people seem to think he was in pain. Compared to his targets or to other humans, who have exceeded their limits for higher callings, Rod’s life was average.
Instead of taking the leadership role and the role of the senior, over his sister and his brother, he allowed his own weakness and his family’s Hollywood moral weaknesses, to do him in. As a result, he self destructed and he is no longer a problem, for anyone. With the internet, anyone with savant level or genius level abilities, as he thought he had, should have been able to figure this out in 10 or so years. All he did was play World of Warcraft, snickers.
That was a pretty cryptic title, but it’s mostly about mass murderers.
(click on the lower right hand button to view in full screen)
Hilarious manifesto, I read most of the last half. Judging by a bit of corroboration in the news reports, the details given in the manifest are correct, such as the murderer refusing to speak to his sister’s boyfriend. That may just be the 99% truth to hide the 1% deception, but it’s good to have confirmation via independent sources. Presumably independent.
So here we have a… person who wants to kill his sister because he’s jealous of his siblings. He thinks he is God, a divine entity that punishes the guilty. Like Dexter or something. His father is a big Hollywood producer or some smuck high up. Hollywood has raised enormous funds for the Leftist alliance’s war on humanity. How, poetic, that this ended up influencing one of their valuable scions to go ballistic on other rich families.
No paste and copy at scribd. Humanity is a disgusting, wretched, depraved species. If I had it in my power I would stop at nothing to reduce every single one of you to mountains of skulls and rivers of blood and rightfully so. You deserve to be annihilated and I will give that to you. You never showed me any mercy so I will show you none.
As I’ve come to learn more about humanity and its flaws, it truly does look more disgusting and wretched. I don’t believe in humanity as a species. I believe in the potential of humanity itself. That may be a rather copy pasted remark from another author’s words, but it will have to suffice. I have seen for myself valor, honor, dignity, liberty, and strength in individual humans. The species itself may be hopeless and full of 68% evil, but that is why it is so exceptional that there are individuals who don’t let the crabs pull them down. The murderer of our little story here, never did meet a single person like that. Not a single one. He grew up in the Hollywood, Leftist, culture, why would he ever meet one? All they have are zombies, child rapists, Polanskis, gun runners in California, and supporters/Obamacans of Hussein O and Eric (Justice is not blind, for I am her eyes) Holder .
The price of enlightenment and knowledge is pain, despair, and hate: hating the very thing one valued and loved. The Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil is not merely an allegory for me, for I’ve seen it in the lives of humanity itself.
The murderer in our final story would have been a good Islamic Jihad convert. Virgins in heaven, using jihad to kill infidels, it’s pretty much the same thing.
(side stepping to a different topic)
The conditioning used on soldiers to make them obey orders to pull the trigger and kill, is mostly using game feedback to reinforce the consequence of accuracy on target with immediate reward, and punish bad actions such as shooting friendlies or hostages with punishment. This makes it into a semi automatic decision, where people are not pulling triggers on humans, but merely targets, scoring points, etc. If the shooter lacks a justification afterwards, guilt and PTSD hits. But this training allows people to distance themselves from the act, allowing them to pull the trigger without hesitation, in most of the cases. In WWII, there was a lot of rumours that most people didn’t even fire their weapons. The training was different. What is seen in this manifesto is the obverse selection. The actor removed himself from humanity itself, he did not remove humanity from his targets. That is interesting, but as a consequence there are no “safeties” on that kind of conditioning (violent conditioning).
The natural hesitation of humans when it comes to killing humans has to do with our desire for love, comraderie, and social acceptance. We don’t kill, because we fear being hurt and killed ourselves in return. If we remove even ourselves from being human… the sky is the limit to what one can do, free of social restrictions. It will then answer the Ultimate Question posed by Socrates.
I would rather die having spoken in my manner, than speak in your manner and live. For neither in war nor yet in law ought any man use every way of escaping death. For often in battle there is no doubt that if a man will throw away his arms, and fall on his knees before his pursuers, he may escape death, if a man is willing to say or do anything. The difficulty, my friends, is not in avoiding death, but in avoiding unrighteousness; for that runs deeper than death.——Socrates before the Athenian Democratic Utopia
Without social restrictions and social morality dictating what a person does, is that person Good or Evil? If we presume to exclude God and the Devil from the picture, and the temptations of the snake con artist, how would a person decide what is Good and Just without external influences?
Socrates made one decision. The murderer makes another. People who hate humanity’s flaws, as I do, would never forgive humans for their evil, just as Plato never forgave humanity and its politics for the death of his sensei, Socrates. But it is the very existence of Socrates, those who society commands to be evil, and yet can refuse in the presence of Death itself to obey evil, that makes a difference for us. There are people like that, for real, living amongst humanity. The truly righteous, those who are on the side of justice, even if everyone around them demands that evil be done. The 3% who fought for freedom in the American Revolution, before it was popular and risk free. The geniuses and Cassandras that are always rejected, misunderstood, and disbelieved. Human history is really a history of these 3% pulling the rest of us along. People in the modern 21st century may benefit from microwaves, economic logistics, and science, but they never built any of that. They contributed 0, to the advancement of human ingenuity and progress.
The murderer fell into despair when he thought society itself was evil and that no one was strong enough in society to resist temptation and evil. Not even himself. He had no role models. The one he constructed of females, fell apart. It may have been saved by one virtuous woman, but he saw none in Hollywood and California (no surprise). So he just self destructed, taking as many people with him as he could. For such a pathetic example of “humanity”, he couldn’t even get as many as Ft. Hood 1’s Hasan did. Whether this is tragic, comedic, or just a downright hilarious waste of resources, will depend on your personal taste.
I’ve seen far worse. This is little more than theater to me. Californian and Hollywood theater at that.
My assessment made there, is this:
While people here (Neo Neocon’s place) should already know this, I’ll repeat the very obvious.
The Democrats scare women with their War on Women rhetoric, by picking on the fear of being raped and helpless. They convince women that if REpublicans win, Democrats will not be able to protect women from rape or unwanted pregnacies. That’s the leverage, the fear, that keeps the slaves in line. Because it isn’t enough to vote one’s conscience, one must vote against the Republicans in that scenario. One can’t merely take a pass and live one’s life under that kind of fear.
In order to reinforce the fear of the punishment, Democrats help blacks and other criminals disarm the population, rape more women, and cause rape on campus to skyrocket due to drinking. With this, they can truly leverage women’s fear, because once a woman has been raped by one of the Left’s operations, that woman will have even more reason to stick to the Democrats that promise protection. Hence Stockholme S achieved. The chain that is invisible is set.
If a person meets a Democrat or a Leftist, and is not sickened to the core of their soul, about to throw up or attack the evil, they don’t truly understand what the Left is and they don’t truly feel hate in their hearts. True hate is not merely choosing chocolate over vanilla. True hate is being sickened by all ice cream merely because one hates the color and sight of vanilla. Those that think they have great emotional control because they can be bipartisan with Democrats, that they can talk to their Democrat friends, while they “hate” the politics: that it is a great act of self control. It’s a limited act of self control, because the emotion they are controlling is very mild.
While kidnappers and torturers control one person and manipulate one person’s mind, the Left manipulates hundreds of millions. Whether there’s any moral difference or ethical difference, I can’t say, other than that the Left is worse.
P.S. Another front, the science fiction writers of America, produced this bit of theater/evidence. http://voxday.blogspot.com/2012/10/john-scalzi-is-rapist.html
Notice how Scalzi wrote that just before an election, directed against a certain demographic, with “trigger” warnings.
“There are two kinds of empathy,” says James Fallon, a neuroscientist at the University of California and author of The Psychopath Inside: A Neuroscientist’s Personal Journey into the Dark Side of the Brain. “Cognitive empathy is the ability to know what other people are feeling, and emotional empathy is the kind where you feel what they’re feeling.” Autistic people can be very empathetic – they feel other people’s pain – but are less able to recognise the cues we read easily, the smiles and frowns that tell us what someone is thinking. Psychopaths are often the opposite: they know what you’re feeling, but don’t feel it themselves. “This all gives certain psychopaths a great advantage, because they can understand what you’re thinking, it’s just that they don’t care, so they can use you against yourself.” (Chillingly, psychopaths are particularly adept at detecting vulnerability. A 2008 study that asked participants to remember virtual characters found that those who scored highly for psychopathy had a near perfect recognition for sad, unsuccessful females, but impaired memory for other characters.)
Good old empathy, a lot of uses for this.
There’s been some interesting articles recently on this topic of personal happiness and the pursuit thereof.
I think there’s two options people have: change themselves or change the world (other people). Leaders are mostly about taking up a position of authority to change the world and its people for some goal or purpose. Psychologists often tell you to change yourself, but that’s more to fit in with society’s rules than for any personal benefit to you.
When I speak of changing myself, I am speaking of making myself more resistant to evil and more resistant to mind control (propaganda). In so far as you should pursue your strengths instead of shoring up your weaknesses, try to pursue activities that improve your spine, your courage, your independence abilities, etc. Virtues come from personal experience and accomplishment. If you want to fix your weaknesses while doing good things, find a way to make your own self the goal of your projects. Instead of looking at society and considering how best to conform to the rules of Authorities, think about how to self direct your own evolution and adaptation instincts.
If you like this topic of self change, read the 3 articles linked here, they are very interesting background related to the central issue.