Archive for the ‘History’ category

The Strategy to Destroy Iraq from the American Presidential desk

June 18, 2014

Well, this is merely to note the occasion by linking a 2007 article for victory in Iraq. I also made several long comments there.

It’s interesting to look back on the time stream.

I believe between that moment in 2007 and 2008, I came across information and did enough research to realize that the Leftist alliance had enormous strategic assets that once activated, would destroy American power and thus by extension Iraq and Afghanistan as well.

I did not forsee that the American President would actively arm and side with the Islamic Jihadists against Afghan and Iraqi security forces, however. That was a detail my crystal ball did not hold.

Once I realized that the Leftist alliance, if left hidden in the US, would break American power and destroy our gains in Iraq and Afghanistan, I began to stop reading mil blogs like blackfive. I could not countenance watching the stories and pictures of people who died for a mission, that I knew the Left would soon cripple or destroy. I had no positive comments. Lead, fight, or get out of the way. If the Leftist alliance in the US was not destroyed, defeat was inevitable in Iraq and Afghanistan. That is what I soon came to believe after 2007. But at this point, I don’t think I had connected all the dots just yet.

Bush II left a safe and secure Iraq to his successor, Hussein O. Look what has happened since. It is not a mistake or mere incompetence, this is engineered destruction. Americans will take a few years to accept and deal with this… incident. Whether Iraq falls or not, to ISIL, Syria, Turkey, Kurds, or the Shia in Iran, doesn’t matter. Just the perception that the US has failed is enough. For six long years I did not reveal my prediction and my growing belief. There won’t be any self fulfilling prophecies from me. If the Tea Party insurgency had succeeded, if the IRS had failed to block their funding, perhaps 2012 would have been different. Perhaps. But so long as the Leftist alliance exists, so long as their power remains unbroken, the United States of America will suffer as it has Never Suffered before.

Islamic Jihad: War on Humanity

June 1, 2014

Although some of us already knew the gist, it’s nice to have a ready source of numbers for the people who need to snort statistics.

Vietnam History Necro

May 1, 2014

Necromancer resurrection of the dead topics.

The comments were particularly interesting. Diem in Vietnam, Iraq 03, Afghanistan, it all ties in together with the Leftist alliance’s war on humanity.

Now that there are few to none enemies abroad that the Left can ally with against the US, they have turned their sights on domestic opposition, what Reid calls domestic terrorists and Hussein calls a need for a civilian security force as strong and well funded as the US military.

That won’t be hard after they gut the US military of parts, manpower, and resources.

This video, though, is kind of funny. Well, funny to people who study violence perhaps. But it’s an example of what happens when war isn’t about bombing foreign brown people, when it becomes a war about foreign brown people at home fighting you then it’s different.

Richard Nixon saw how Vietnam was a waste of lives and how the draft was corrupt, so both were ended. But he somehow got the blame for Vietnam, a “Republican war” as the Left likes to think of it.

Master Archery

April 22, 2014

They don’t show the “secret” technique on those wikipedia photos. But for those that want to go back to a sort of Wildfire type Hunger Games setting, that’s what you should be aiming for.

Smaller bows are better, using modern construction. Leave the long range stuff for the .50 caliber sniper rifle users.

General human mastery needs around 10,000 man hours of practice. A repost of something I got from

Highest mastery feat for handguns is to be able to shoot from the hip or from non conventional angles, and hit a target at about the same range accuracy point as regular people using two hand stances on stationary targets. Same concept. Cross wind calculation with 2 km sniping targets, same concept. Same concept, different applications though.

The Democrat Institution of Slavery

April 18, 2014

Some very interesting research sources in the comment sections about the Democrat institution of slavery in the social, philosophical, political, and moral areas.

This is contrasted with slavery in the Biblical, Roman, Greek, and British sense.

If the planters controlled the lower South, they were likely to control the border States; and if they held these two sections together in national legislation, they were more than likely to guide the policy of the United States as a whole, for a compact minority with great wealth behind it and with leisure to devote to public affairs is almost certain to govern any country. That is, a population of two and a half millions in the lower South, with only a tenth of them directly connected with slavery, would guide a nation of twenty millions, ninetenths of whom were either outspoken or silent opponents of slavery and all it connoted.

Under these circumstances the leaders of the lower South undertook about 1840 to widen the area of slavery, that is, expand the cotton kingdom. John C. Calhoun, who controlled a large following in both political parties in the eastern end of the lower South, was an ardent advocate of expansion. The young Senator from Mississippi, Robert Walker, a leader of the Jackson wing of the planters on the Mississippi and a most adroit politician, was even more ardently in favor of annexations. After some years of maneuvering the two men effected a working alliance of the cotton men of the South and the farmers of the West: and in the Democratic convention of 1844 they committed thj Democratic party of the country to their ambitious policy. They defeated Henry Clay at the time when he had set his heart on the presidency and elected James K. Polk, who completed the annexation of Texas, declared war on Mexico, and took possession of New Mexico, California, and Oregon, in spite of the opposition of John Quincy Adams, Daniel Webster, Martin Van Buren, and Clay himself.

The success of the movement gave the planters such confidence in themselves and such prestige before the country that they felt themselves invincible. Southern and Western volunteers offered themselves with such enthusiasm and fought over the Mexican hills and mountains with such brilliancy that Southern members of Congress declared that the whole North American continent should be seized and held. Western Democrats like Senator Douglas of Illinois shared this vision of a con tinental republic. If Jefferson Davis, just entering political life from the Southwest, was set upon making an American lake of the Gulf of Mexico, Lewis Cass, speaking for the Northwest, was equally covetous of Canada.

…..Balked in their plans, the spokesmen of Mississippi, duly prompted by Calhoun, gathered in a mass meeting at Jackson, their state capital, early in December, 1849. They called upon the people of Mississippi and of the other planter States to arouse themselves and defend their property and their institutions. Later the Legislature of Mississippi elected delegates to a Southern convention to be held at Nashville, Tennessee, in June, 1850. All the other Southern States responded with more or less enthusiasm. If Congress refused to allow slavery to be carried into California or New Mexico, then — according to the threat often heard — the cotton States would secede.

This particular section was interesting, posted by Gringo.

Slavery was a Southern phenomenon because it was the de facto way the South’s aristocracy of Demoncrat Fers could have to keep their power and social authority.

During Jim Crow, that wasn’t really economic. Black labor could help Atlanta rebuild, but that wasn’t allowed because it would break the power balance. Northern money wasn’t accepted either for rebuilding. Most of the South’s post war deconstruction myth they talk about came about due to Democrat commands to go it alone, with neither black liberty, labor, political representation nor Republican Northern money or military security accepted as legit.

Knock down slavery, the Democrats put up Jim Crow. Knock down Jim Crow, the Democrats put up separate but equal. Knock down separate but equal, and the Democrats kill Luther Jr and Malcom X, to shut them up, and take over the black community and make the blacks vote Democrat.

Southerns sometimes mention that no more than 5% or even 2% of Southerners owned slaves. That included rich Indians and blacks who owned slaves too, perhaps. The cost… was either too high or there were other barriers.

I don’t disagree on the figures. It just shows that 2% of a people can control 99% of the people in a democracy. Rule for and by demons, demoncracy.

It’s like the conspiracy theorists over at Tea Party and INfowars thinking this country’s policy is run by 20,000 Marxists. It’s not like that would ever happen, right.

There were all kinds of white Southern aristocrats that wanted to change or reform the system. The system didn’t want to change. General Lee didn’t like slavery, the South told his As to shut up and sit down, his opinion wasn’t needed. Forest didn’t like the KKK, even though he founded a chapter to restore economic security in the South, because the South told his As to shut the hell up and sit down, they were going to lynch them some niggers.

98% of the Southern population never saw any of that, so they thought it was some alien problem and that everyone was doing their best to work out a solution (except the Republicans). Everyone thinks the Democrats are just another political party, that bipartisanship and compromises will “work out a solution”.

If only healthcare became affordable. If only technology would solve environmental and energy problems. If only. If technology solved those problems, the Democrats would make some more sh up the next day.

Starting on Page 53.

Click on the image embed for the page and then begin reading.

This is damning research. My own conclusions were pieced together from disparate clues and data points, but this research work ties in a lot of things I was unaware of.

The amount of social reinforcement and mind control used in the Old South to produce the social harmony that led to an entire society going to war based upon the command of 2% of their population, echoes something else I’ve read about.

Some more sources and comments on how current Democrat propaganda is the same as old Democrat propaganda.

The Real Black History Month

February 14, 2014

Want to stop a bullet with paper?

February 3, 2014

The Chinese applied the yin over the yang principle here in the making of practical paper armor.

Christian reaction to Roman social morality

January 27, 2014

If one wonders why certain practices were condemned, I agree with some scholars in that the most likely explanation is a Christian reaction to Roman morality on the subject of sex.

The Latin verb for “to penetrate anally, bugger” is pedicare. The object was usually but not always male. Pedicare was a blunt and non-euphemistic word, and can be used in a threatening manner, as notoriously by Catullus in Carmen 16, or in general to mean “fuck you.”[532] The etymology of pedicare is unclear, but some have thought it derived from Greek paidika, having to do with pederasty.[533] The basic word for “anus” was culus. Common metaphors are ficus, “fig,” and anus, “ring,” which was considered a decorous term and was standard in medical texts.[534]

Men were said to “take it like a woman” (muliebria pati, “to undergo womanly things”) when they were anally penetrated, but when a man performed anal sex on a woman, she was thought of as playing the boy’s role.[535] Martial, for instance, is emphatic that anal sex is better with boys than with women; when his wife objects that she provides him with anal sex in an effort to preserve his fidelity, he taunts her with the inferiority of her anus compared to a boy’s.[536]

The figura veneris in which the woman crouches to lift her buttocks, called “the lioness”, may be intended for anal penetration, since boys in Greek art can be portrayed in the same position; with a female partner, it may be difficult to distinguish in art from a tergo (rear entry).[537] Culibonia (“good anal”) was a humorous term for a prostitute with this speciality.[538] Avoiding pregnancy may have been one motive for female prostitutes to offer anal intercourse,[539] since literary sources indicate that boys were preferred.

Os impurum, “filthy mouth” or “impure mouth”, was a term of abuse especially for those who provided oral sex.[540] “Oral turpitude”[541] was a favorite form of invective for Catullus,[542] Horace, and Martial.[541] An accusation of having an os impurum is an “extreme obscenity,”[543] so vile that Cicero reserved it for men of lower standing than himself,[544] only implying that their debasement tainted their more powerful patrons who were his real targets.[545]

Wall painting from Pompeii depicting cunnilingus

It was a convention of obscenely comic verse that oral sex caused bad breath that was nearly toxic.[546] “Whores of the alleyways” are contaminated from giving oral sex; Catullus refers to “the foul saliva of a pissed-over whore.”[547] The urinary function of the penis makes oral sex particularly repulsive to Catullus, who elsewhere reviles a Celtiberian for brushing his teeth in urine.[548] Martial jokes that a fine perfume turned to garum, fish sauce, when it was sniffed by a man whose breath was putrid from oral sex.[549] In another of Martial’s epigrams, a fellator breathes on a hot cake to cool it down and turns it to excrement.[550] The bad breath and rotten teeth that are attributed to performing oral sex represent moral decay and a general corruption of the mouth’s positive functions as the organ of a citizen’s persuasive speech.[551]

Because of the stigma attached to providing physical pleasure, a man who performed oral sex on a woman was subject to mockery. Cunnilingus typically appears in Roman art only as part of a reciprocal act, with the woman fellating her male partner in some variation of the “69″ position.[552] A wall painting from Pompeii, however, represents a virtually unique role reversal in the giving of oral sex. The woman who receives cunnilingus is tall and shapely, well-groomed, and brazenly nude except for jewelry. The male figure is relatively small, crouching subserviently, and fully clothed; he has an anxious or furtive look.[553] The situation is so extreme that it was probably meant to be humorous as well as titillating; other paintings in this group show a series of sex acts, at least some of which could be seen as transgressive or parodic.[554]

There is some evidence that women could hire male prostitutes to provide cunnilingus. Graffiti at Pompeii advertise the prices male prostitutes charged for cunnilingus, in the same price range as females performing fellatio; however, the graffiti could be intended as insults to the men named, and not as actual advertisements.[555] One graffito is perhaps intended as political invective: “Vote Isidore for aedile; he’s the best at licking cunt!”[556]

Woman fellating a man on an oil lamp

The Latin verb fellare is usually used for a woman performing oral sex on a man.[557] Accusing a man of fellating another man was possibly the worst insult in all Roman invective.[558] It was an act that might be requested from women who were infames,[559] and not something a husband in a respectable household would have expected from his wife.[560] Fellatio was seen as a “somewhat laughable” preference for older men who have trouble maintaining an erection,[561] but graffiti show that the skills of a good fellatrix were enthusiastically utilized.[562] Fellatio was a fairly uncommon subject in Roman art.[560]

Irrumatio is a forced form of fellatio, almost always against another man. Forcing someone to be a receptacle for oral sex was proof of virility, something to boast about, as indicated by the Priapeia and the poems of Catullus and Martial. It was also threatened as a punishment,[563] particularly for adulterers.[564] Martial urges a wronged husband who has already cut off the adulterous man’s ears and nose to complete the humiliation by befouling his mouth with oral rape.[565]

2012 Era Predictions

January 26, 2014

Yea, that stuff was probably funny paranoid to many in 2012, before the elections. But when I started thinking of similar things in 2007, many people were even less likely to believe. When I read articles like that, I realized my self appointed hibernation period was about to end.

The Final Solution: Supported by women

December 21, 2013

The same thing will happen in the US, as people stick their head in the sand pretending the tsunami will go away with time and elections.

“500,000 women had front-row seats to the Final Solution, where they watched and benefitted from the rapidly declining “racially inferior” masses. And yet their presence, and their atrocities, have been largely ignored for the last 70 years. Twenty years ago, Lower was researching in Zhytomyr, a city in western Ukraine, leafing through the normal stuff of archives, the fading ink and illegible handwriting on tattered paper, some of which had bootprints and charred edges. It was there, among the German records that had been inaccessible under the Iron Curtain, that Lower began to notice an abundance of women’s names among the empire-builders. . . . There is link between the shockingly cavalier testimony given by these women and our collective ignorance of their actions in the Nazi East: genocide is usually considered the business of men, and thus, when it came time to call Nazis to account for their crimes, prosecutors were less interested in these women than in their male colleagues and husbands. . . . Jewish survivors have consistently described German women in the Nazi East as violent tormenters, not innocent bystanders.”

Do not believe in the lies from authority concerning “better systems”. Female genital mutilation in Africa and Islam is primarily enforced by women. There are numerous females in North Korea’s totalitarian regime, not as backups to the power but as the authority and power itself.

There’s a reason why the term “Femi-nazis” exist in popular speech, even though we wish to think there is no historical back up or evidence for it.

The world is not what modern history says it is. Truth is not what the authorities say it is in high school or college. TV, talking heads, and news reporters aren’t telling the truth. Because they aren’t allowed to know the truth.

Always research things and acquire sources of data on your own. Do not make decisions about the fabric of reality based upon the word of anyone else. Independence of thought does not come from obeying your cultural, religious, government, or economic hierarchy. Of course it doesn’t come from rebelling against it either, that’s just another type of tool used by external provocateurs.


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.