jump to navigation

Sarah Palin’s Speech July 4, 2009

Posted by ymarsakar in Politics.
1 comment so far

We were purchased as a territory because a member of President Abe Lincoln’s cabinet, William Seward, providentially saw in this great land, vast riches, beauty, strategic placement on the globe, and opportunity. He boldly looked “North to the Future”. But he endured such ridicule and mocking for his vision for Alaska, remember the adversaries scoffed, calling this “Seward’s Folly”. Seward withstood such disdain as he chose the uncomfortable, unconventional, but right path to secure Alaska, so Alaska could help secure the United States.

I find it peculiar she would use this example in such a fashion. After all, Seward absolutely mimics Sarah Palin herself. This is the first time, but not the last time, you will hear the “uncomfortable and unconventional” being mentioned.

And you know me by now, I promised even four years ago to show my independence… no more conventional “politics as usual”.

Certainly her resignation is unconventional. But how so?

And we made common sense conservative choices to eliminate personal luxuries like the jet, the chef, the junkets… the entourage.

How many of the power mad obsessed narcissists in this world would have been able to do as she did? How many? You? You think you could have refused to be corrupted by privilege, power, and the taxpayer’s wealth? Like physical courage, nobody knows until they get there. And Sarah got there, and I witnessed her refusal to be corrupted. And the Demoncrats will fault me for my loyalty. As if anyone truly loyal to the United States Constitution, a government by the people for the people, would be an enemy or even lukewarm supporter of a leader like Sarah Palin. What is the point of the US Constitution except to promote people like her so that everyone is uplifted to such standards? A government by the people, for the people, cannot be sustained by idiots, cowards, or lambs. A republic, if you can keep it, isn’t sustained by soy milk and vegetarian diets. It is nurtured by the blood of patriots and tyrants.

I’ve seen leaders and I’ve seen followers. I’ve led and I’ve followed. I’ve been put into situations where obviously nobody wanted to lead, which left me, the inadequate person, to be the best one at the job. And it is tiresome. It is annoying. It is leading and micromanaging a bunch of children who have to be told what to do, when to do it, and what not to put in their mouths. You, the leader, take ultimate responsibility because you have the ultimate power over these children. People are stupid, as I have said before, because they are so easily manipulated. Not because they lack the inability to solve the problems in front of them, they are not slow. They are just lazy. They follow the course of least resistance. They take the easy path. They take the convenient path. And they are corrupted by it. A little bit at a time. Good work ethics turns into laziness, into procrastination, into self-delusion and self-deception. “Oh, I’ll do it sometime later”. And when sometime later comes on, then people say, “Oh, I still got some more time”. And if this is easy to do because it is a bad habit, how much more easy does the power mad and the greedy sociopaths in Congress have in being corrupted by wealth and power? You think they haven’t been taking the path of least resistance and shaving a little bit off the top every day of the week, every month of the year, for every year that they have been in power? Of course they have. And even if they were elected not to do so, even if they wanted to resist, they were taken down one way or another. Chased out of politics, destroyed personally, like Jack Ryan against Obama, or corrupted by the system in “playing along to get along”. How long can you work with the likes of Ted Kennedy or Chicago politicians, while being prevented from simply eliminating them outright, before you start thinking a compromise with the corrupt would be a good idea? But are deals with the Devil really good ideas? Will they give you what you sought or will it taint forever the purpose to which you originally sought. I already know the answer to that. Democracy doesn’t work when you have to compromise between the lamb’s right to exist and the tiger’s right to a meal. Bush tried with No Child Left Behind. McCain tried with Feingold. Epic fails. And not very constitutional either.

And the Lt. Governor and I said “no” to our pay raises.

That alone qualifies her over 99% of our elite ruling aristos. Including the greedy American people talking about greedy Wall Street Crooks. They only want to put those people in jail because certain Americans want their money for themselves.

So much success in this first term – and with this success I am proud to take credit… for hiring the right people! Our goal was to achieve a gasline project, more fair oil and gas valuation, and ethics reform in four years. We did it in two. It’s because of the people… good public servants surrounding the Governor’s office, with servants’ hearts and astounding work ethic… they are Alaska’s success!

More and more I am reminded of Honor Harrington who also had a strong team. Her successes were often not due so much to her own individual talents, but the pooled talents of her loyal (loyal, not backstabbing like McCain’s people) circle. If you wonder why else I mention her, ask a question. If you have read the series, I am sure some other things may have come to mind already.

We are doing well! I wish you’d hear more from the media of your state’s progress and how we tackle Outside interests – daily – special interests that would stymie our state. Even those debt-ridden stimulus dollars that would force the heavy hand of federal government into our communities with an “all-knowing attitude” – I have taken the slings and arrows with that unpopular move to veto because I know being right is better than being popular. Some of those dollars would harm Alaska and harm America – I resisted those dollars because of the obscene national debt we’re forcing our children to pay, because of today’s Big Government spending; it’s immoral and doesn’t even make economic sense!

This ties in with the uncomfortable and unconventional theme she mentioned before. As an analyst I find this particularly interesting. Because, of course, we do know that Obama is forcing the states to take money that they don’t necessarily want nor need. I suppose this is a foreign idea to a mobster like Obama. Sort of like when stores won’t pay the mob’s protection racket, except in this case the racket is Obama redistributing other people’s money in such a way that it becomes normal. In such a way that it corrupts others into taking it, using it, being an accessory to the theft. To what level did this affect her decision? Was she successful in resisting the dollars? Did she veto it but was overridden due to the unpopularity of her stance? Does she know the damage that will do, and thus wants to get inside the enemy’s OODA loop so that the Governorship of Alaska will finally be able to put actual time and effort into preparing the state for this catastrophe? Questions, but I have no data sources or informants to supply the answers. That will take time.

Some say things changed for me on August 29th last year – the day John McCain tapped me to be his running-mate – I say others changed.

And I say that the Demoncrats just showed their true colors. After all, after I had discarded the popular conception that Democrats were opposing the war because of personal conscience issues and personal policy differences, I had to settle on another interpretation of Democrat attacks on the Iraqi people, the US military, and their commander in chief, George W Bush. What was that interpretation, you may wonder? It was that the Democrats are more ruthless than the Republicans. That the Democrats, when they attacked Republicans for allowing security to fall down, was being extraordinarily ruthless to their domestic enemies and to the Iraqi people. Some of this was part of history. FDR and certainly Truman’s decision to drop two A-bombs. This interpretation also uses the fact that Democrats were responsible for America entering two, not just one, World Wars. They are not exactly warmongers, but they do not lack ruthlessness when they believe they have something they can gain. This was, of course, extraordinarily counter-intuitive. For the most popular conception of the day, in 2004-6, was that Democrats were milquetoast people (Doves) that didn’t want to get their hands dirty in Iraq. While certainly that is true, it didn’t tell the whole story. The Demoncrats didn’t help out in Iraq, not because they were cowards, but because they saw the insurgents and the terrorists as allies of the Demoncrat attempt to overthrow American exceptionalism. Not because they lacked ruthlessness. Do you think the operatives of Obama and the Demoncrat party who could plan out such an attack on Bush and Sarah Palin would bat any eye at hanging Saddam Hussein or his Republican Guard gestapo? Of course, not. They didn’t help America win the war, they didn’t support it, because of the same reason why Obama supported the mullahs and Chavez and the dictator wannabes (while bowing to the already dictators, the Saudis). Obama the megalomaniac doesn’t lack ruthlessness. He just lacks an interest in helping liberty and human rights succeed against his pals, Chavez, the Saudis, and the Iranian Revolutionary Council.

Political operatives descended on Alaska last August, digging for dirt. The ethics law I championed became their weapon of choice. Over the past nine months I’ve been accused of all sorts of frivolous ethics violations – such as holding a fish in a photograph, wearing a jacket with a logo on it, and answering reporters’ questions.

Why do terrorists and mass murderers use our laws, respect for human life, and obedience of the rules of war against us? Because it works. Why does the Demoncrats use the politics of personal destruction? Cause it works. Why do I favor execution and violence as an effective solution to Gordian Knot type problems? Cause it works. And until people stop allowing it to work, until they defeat such users or methods, they don’t have a stool to stand on when they start spouting off about “how torture doesn’t work” or how “the politics of personal destruction are bad”. Of course it became their weapons of choice. For the ruthless and those without a conscience, they have no reason not to use your own beliefs against you. That’s what being ruthless means people. And I’m not against being ruthless. I’m just against the Left using it to destroy America in order to enrich themselves.

And what about the people who offer up these silly accusations? It doesn’t cost them a dime so they’re not going to stop draining public resources – spending other peoples’ money in their game.

She hates corruption. She could not resist it without that emotion, a direct consequence of her philosophical beliefs. But could she stop it if she was in office? If she believed that she couldn’t stop those attacks, what would she do?

And one chooses how to react to circumstances. You can choose to engage in things that tear down, or build up. I choose to work very hard on a path for fruitfulness and productivity. I choose not to tear down and waste precious time; but to build up this state and our country, and her industrious, generous, patriotic, free people!

Since the attacks won’t stop, it seems she is going to do something else, something pro-active. Something that makes the enemies react to her, rather than the other way around. That is strategically valid, although the details remain yet to be seen.

And there is such a need to build up and fight for our state and our country. I choose to fight for it! And I’ll work hard for others who still believe in free enterprise and smaller government; strong national security for our country and support for our troops; energy independence; and for those who will protect freedom and equality and life… I’ll work for and campaign for those proud to be American, and those who are inspired by our ideals and won’t deride them.

Still more hints. No details, of course.

And so as I thought about this announcement that I wouldn’t run for re-election and what it means for Alaska, I thought about how much fun some governors have as lame ducks… travel around the state, to the Lower 48 (maybe), overseas on international trade – as so many politicians do. And then I thought – that’s what’s wrong – many just accept that lame duck status, hit the road, draw the paycheck, and “milk it”. I’m not putting Alaska through that – I promised efficiencies and effectiveness! That’s not how I am wired. I am not wired to operate under the same old “politics as usual.” I promised that four years ago – and I meant it.

It’s not what is best for Alaska.

I am determined to take the right path for Alaska even though it is unconventional and not so comfortable.

Unconventional and uncomfortable. Is she ducking out of the Governorship because the campaigning she needs to do before the 2010 elections will make her look like a “conventional politician” if she has the governorship? If she had to make a decision to not seek a second term, do you think she had time to give to Obama? Two years? What do you think Obama would have done in two years? How much has he done in Six Months? Perhaps you think he is going to slow down, eh?

The “hell yeah” sealed it – and someday I’ll talk about the details of that…

Those details should be interesting.

I do not want to disappoint anyone with my decision; all I can ask is that you trust me with this decision – but it’s no more “politics as usual”.

I do not care what God you believe in, Sarah. So long as you believe. It matters not to me whether your God exists or not. So long as you believe. It will be enough for me.

Yes, I was disappointed. Disappointed that a strong leader could be taken down by the attacks of my enemies. Just as I was disappointed at the fall of Rhodesia to UN and Carter based attacks. Just as I was disappointed at the Fall of Saigon. At the Bay of Pigs.

I was never disappointed with Sarah Palin’s decision. I am loyal to her because she is loyal to the US Constitution. The country I still love. The country I am willingly to kill for. To die for. Sarah says that she isn’t retreating. If that is true, I will support her. If it comes to be that it isn’t true, I will understand. For I too have often wanted to abdicate the responsibility of leadership. But if she believes, if she truly believes, she will have the strength to go on. And so will we.

To whatever god or entity of power you believe in, pray that Obama’s erosion of American justice and strength can be stopped.

Background reading. ()

Faith: Strength or Weakness? June 29, 2009

Posted by ymarsakar in Culture, Philosophy.
2 comments

Mike D,

John Ringo and Tom Kratman’s newest novel about the Tuloriad (a sort of Odyssey for Posleen) brought up an interesting concept.

I do not believe in Revealed Truth in the form that God inspired some prophets and those prophets then handed down the word of God in the form of the testaments or the Bible/Qu’ran. I believe that there are misinterpretations and some basic human limitations that prevent the word of God from being communicated through any written or verbal format.

Now religion has constructed a system or a hierarchy based upon these Revealed Truth texts. They take its truth or validity based upon faith. Atheists, however, will claim that this faith is foolish or false or destructive. They quote such things as the Inquisition or other similar incidents as their proof. Or as Hitchens likes to say, since God wouldn’t allow such evil things as he has seen to exist, God therefore must not exist. Which is sort of like saying good government would not allow tax cheats and other traitors to live in America, thus good government does not exist at all. Which totally ignores the phenomenon of Ronald Reagan, Sarah Palin, and George Washington. It ignores the providence that gave America its successes in both war and peace.

So is faith really all that wrong because it believes in oftentimes the wrong things or at least unprovable things? Recall that faith is what kept the three aforementioned strong and on the right path.

So what does it matter what gays believe or what people choose to believe is the origin of their sexual inclinations and preferences. It matters not to me, certainly, even though it matters to Christian issues of sin and the societal framework of equal protection under the law. It matters not to me because what matters to me is strength. Regardless of what you believe in, so long as you are willing to die or kill for it, it gives human beings strength. And for the Palestinians, certainly it gives them strength, of a sort, to continue to fight and die and kill for their beliefs. Even though we believe their beliefs are erroneous and completely self-destructive, even though we see their tactics as cowardly and unethical, still their belief gives them strength. And that we cannot deny. Even for people like me who believe that that strength can be easily shattered with ruthless tactics and strategies on our part.

Just as the Goracle derives strength from his mass delusion of a cult, aka Global Climate Change (GCS, GW, GC; notice the Gs?), the Democrats derive political surety and power from the Goracle’s cult, and Obama derives power from the Democrats, so is it also true that humanity derives power from faith. And it does not matter what you have faith in, so long as you believe: a True Believer.

9/11, if it taught me anything, taught me that.

Now the atheists and Leftists like to disparage and make fun of the faith of Christians, pro-Americans, patriots, as well as classical liberals. You have seen evidence of all of the above, so I feel I have no need to quote the relevant evidence. But you know, as well as I do, what they think of faith and the people who ascribe to it. But their issue isn’t with faith, their issue is with apostasy. The Left and their Communist originators and inspirer(s) do not hold anything against faith. After all, does not the Left constitute a gigantic organization that puts their faith and belief in Utopia, in human Perfection and in the ultimate good of Human Slavery? Of course they do. No, what they hate is faith of a sort different from their own. They hate the apostate. They hate the person who believes in a different religion. They hate all that is different, all that is not themselves, all that can interfere with their Road to Serfdom (aka Utopia). In fact, they hate themselves as well, but in order to deal with that, they have to funnel externally that hate, lest it corrode their own self-esteems. We’ve seen this from narcissists. Who is a biggest believer in faith, if not the narcissist who believes in the Ultimate Truth that he is the center of the universe and that nothing else matters except what he likes and loves? Does anyone here think he made a “rational” decision based upon “evidence” for such views? Heh

And yet, the Left has run a successful campaign mocking faith, while remaining free of the consequences to their own ideologies. Why? Because the Right, made up out of people who respect other belief systems and the faith of others, will not make mockery of the Left’s faith based initiatives. Thus the war is lost because the war was never fought to begin with. But that is ancillary to my main issue of contention.

Because I care about strength, I know that human beings are weak, whether in the individual sense or when they group together. In this sense, the Left is right that weak people need religion. But their belief is that religion keeps people weak. My point is that the Left’s religion keeps people weak, because the Left uses religion to further their totalitarian goals. Religion, like any other socio-political tool, is as good or as evil as the users. Given that the Left are some of the most evil bastards around, I will let you figure out their intentions.

My belief is that people will never become stronger than they are until they have faith, in something. If they are lucky enough to believe in something True or simply positive, then they will become stronger for it. Because that is the prerequisite for human strength, that we have to believe in something. Look up the closest nihilist, who doesn’t believe in anything except his personal pleasures, and tell me he is the model for Strength. I dare ya to without falling down from laughter.

As we can see with Obama and the Left, certainly their faith in totalitarian beliefs, their faith in their own “Right to Rule” based upon genetic and intelligence prerequisites, and their faith in the power of their wealth and political connections, makes them strong. Strong enough to corrupt this nation, at least. Strong enough to enslave the weak, certainly. Strong enough to put a boot heel on the aspirations of Iranians, Iraqis, and Americans, most definitely.

But that’s what war is for. Conflict between human hierarchies, at its base, was always about “Let God decide which side has the right of things, by pitting our strength of faith against your strength of faith”. This was done in Greek hoplite battles. Whoever was the first to run from the battlefield, was proven wrong for obviously if they lacked the courage to stand and die for their beliefs, obviously their opponents have the stronger case (if only because it was more important to their opponents). This influenced Trial by Combat, as well as the Code Duello in early american affairs.

A nation that lacks a generation of young men and women who will fight, kill, and die for their nation, is a nation that is already dead. All that is necessary is to wait for the wind to knock it over. A nation that is not worthy of inspiring enough faith for people to kill others for, to die in defense of that nation, is not a nation worthy of respect or admiration or anything else for that matter. The Left knew this, they engineered this. They knew it was true because they knew the power of Faith. That’s why Stalin’s Russia destroyed the Roman Orthodox Church. Faith is power, if you can manipulate it, but that requires that you have a monopoly on faith. And that isn’t possible unless you eliminate all competitors. Any competitor that says “we have something more worthy of your faith, of your blood and of your life”? Why, he has to be eliminated, people. Just as the Left must eliminate Christians and American patriots. Just as the Islamic extremists must eliminate Iraqi Sunnis, Iraqi Shia, and the Jews.

I am not an Atheist but neither am I a Christian. Book, as in the Shepherd in Firefly, was a good guide in clarifying matters here. The Operator in Firefly was certainly someone I could understand. Faith does fix you, if only because until human beings are ready to kill or die for something, they aren’t worth shat. They’re just cogs in the machine, sheep, waiting to be slaughtered. Not worth anything. This does not make Faith a solution, it only makes it the path to a potential solution. As we see with Leftist totalitarians and the Islamic Jihad, faith is not a cure all. Just cause you believe, doesn’t mean what you believe is right or even true.

An ancillary comment I made concerning human beliefs can also be accessed here.

Iconic Action Stars May 28, 2009

Posted by ymarsakar in Humour.
add a comment

I haven’t laughed as long as this in a while. Great entertainment and an interesting history lesson, even.

Psychological Warfare May 27, 2009

Posted by ymarsakar in Culture, Humanity, Psychology, Unconventional Warfare.
add a comment

Haven’t had the requisite inspiration to write anything worth posting here. But I have made some, perhaps, interesting comments on the topic of our day, dark as it is with Our Big Ass Mistake America in power.

First, a little comparison of therapy and non-therapy that Book was gracious enough to let me guest blog.

Then there is Book’s “How to Talk to a Liberal”, which addresses certain communication and propaganda methodologies to employ against our arch nemesis, the cannon fodder and true believer.

And as a bonus, here is a link courtesy of Neo-Neocon concerning a Berkley operator and stealth conservative and her travails amongst enemy territory.

Hope you enjoy. I am sure there will come a crisis soon enough that I cannot prevent myself from writing an analysis about here.

Susan Boyle: Crowd Reactions and Analysis April 20, 2009

Posted by ymarsakar in Music.
3 comments

[These are three of my comments concerning Susan Boyle and the reactions of both the audience and the judges.]

The I have a Dream from Les Miserables really did capture the emotional impact of her musicality.

People heard the song from many levels. Simon’s been a past master at emotional manipulation, aka drama, so it is no surprise. And it doesn’t even matter whether he heard her rehearse before the show, either, he has seen enough of these surprises to know how the audience will react and he plays his part dutifully.

I am not a master at reading facial language, but the female judge looked genuinely surprised and the other male judge only looked moderately surprised but got himself in check very fast when it came time for comments to the effect that I didn’t read any surprise latent in his mannerisms once he started talking.

The first thing people heard was the audience’s amusement at this middle age woman who has a quirky mannerism and a subtle, not pronounced, accent. The image and expectation with singing devas and stars were too incongruous for the audience and some of the particularly younger members (including one foolish and inexperienced young female who rolled her eyes and was caught on camera). THen the audience heard the expectation and the fear, their own and each other’s. People feared a train wreck, others expected one, and still others were hoping for an underdog extreme success. One girl was holding her hand against her mouth, cause she was so gripped with expectation and dread of a embarassing moment. Still others were envious and admired her for her pluck and determination in front of such an audience reaction, something most of the audience knew in their heart of heart’s that they could never ever withstand such a thing as she has been doing.

And then the song. First the surprise reaction and the applause. Not sure who they were applauding, as she was here to show her talent and she hasn’t finished just yet. I surmise the audience was applauding fate or serendipity or luck that had them be the audience to see such a thing at such a moment in such a show.

THen after the relief and the joy and the various other emotions started cropping up in the audience gripping them, came the musicality. People started actually hearing the words and it interspersed with what they heard from her auto-biographical details and some of Obama’s Hope and Change mantra that has filtered into the dull wits of the young and the foolish cynical minds of the old.

They saw her success and heard the words of the song and knew she was living her dream. Her hope. And they then started applauding that.

I could not have planned a better propaganda event had I the resources of an entire government and I had been given the charge of improving morale for an existential war effort.

# Ymarsakar Says:
April 14th, 2009 at 12:44 pm

I rewatched the judge’s expressions during the song and here are my more conclusive judgments.

The other male judge on the left didn’t hear her first rehearsal so he was surprised. Neither did the female judge. Simon, however, I suspect, did know. If not by actually hearing it then at least because he was told by those that did hear her before her stage performance.

Btw, the female judge, while very attractive before, became stunning once you started seeing the interplay of emotions on her face.

And, of course, not everybody was against Susan. That was just a judge’s projection or displacement or theatre act. There are those like me, I am sure, who watched the reactions of others far more than we watched the actions of Susan on stage. And this would have been true even had we been tipped off that this was something special, spectacular, or spectral.

Simon, of course, was perhaps surprised only in the sense of how powerful the words of her song was combined with SUsan’s singing voice and the reaction of the audience. You could see Simon enjoying the audience’s reactions and even once started glancing around before he caught himself.

# Ymarsakar Says:
April 14th, 2009 at 12:55 pm

Okay, I just heard Simon’s comments for the first time and he admitted he knew. Which is as I surmised.

The female judge commented that “we were cynical”. I wouldn’t phrase it that way, actually. Rather, it is more like when cynics don’t believe in things, they will then believe in anything produced by a good con man, as Obama has testified and demonstrated.

I would term it this way. The people are fools not because of what they believe or do not believe, they are fools because they do not pay attention to the emotions and reactions of others. THey are not vigilant. Whatever they feel and whatever they think, they are unable to control because they don’t even notice what causes it in others, how can they notice what causes it in themselves?

They do not understand the power of emotional manipulation or psychological adjustments. THey do not understand the basis of power or what moves the masses. They are not a Simon or a Reagan or even an Obama.

They do not respect work because it has been drilled in our society that 1. either you are born with talent and genetic benefits like intelligence or 2. you are relegated to the bottom classes, economically or otherwise. Social Equality is such a big deal because people believe that things cannot be balanced any other way except through the all powerful government, which they have been taught brought the US out of a World Wide recession and won a world war in the bargain. They want that kind of comfort. THey want to be able to say “I am not responsible for this, therefore I need not feel any guilt for the government will take care of the inequalities for me”.

Dirty Jobs has already proven that there has been a war on honest work in favor of “intellectual pursuits”. But the cost of that is a further handicap on people, young or old, to misinterpret their reality.

Obama’s Character: The Reality Beneath the Veil April 2, 2009

Posted by ymarsakar in Unconventional Warfare.
7 comments

Very useful in setting up an accurate psychological profile on Obama. We’ll need one if we are to predict his actions and to distinguish his real actions from the fake actions that we will see very often, if I am not mistaken.

How I Would Counter-Attack: George Carlin’s Propaganda and Nihilism April 2, 2009

Posted by ymarsakar in Corruption, Culture, Politics.
4 comments

Please watch the video first before reading the below. View at least the first half. And then view it again as you read, because you won’t be able to get the context unless you “hear” the words and the interplay as I quote and reply to them.

This is one of the best highlights of Leftist thinking and modus operandi I’ve seen yet. Perhaps they are more loose lipped on such a show than they would be on cable television, Fox News or no Fox News, but it is valuable data for any strategist or tactician, let alone those like me.

In what fashion is that true? In this fashion: notice how the host says that it doesn’t matter to (them) people whether OJ was guilty, everyone knew he was guilty, thus it doesn’t matter what Nagin did, they probably know he was incompetent to boot. No, what matters is that the “greater society” did not give what was owed to the poor blacks, which was “help”. One of the arguments of the black community leaders was that all the money spent in Iraq and all the soldiers there could have been put to better use in America’s inner cities. Of course, the reality is that they would have done better under the aegis of the Left, that is the real plan behind their facade, but in general this is still an argument of wealth redistribution. It is an argument born of entitlement. And it is their Achilles Heel in the end.

So let me present my attack, the counter-offense to all the things that was said and unsaid by the white guy on the Left trying to explain, hesitantly and emotionally, that blacks can’t lift themselves out of poverty by volunteering to be house and plantation slaves of Democrats, Republicans, or anyone else in government.

These elections are a charade. These elections are in place to give the people an illusion of choice-George Carlin

Of course, which is why Obama’s election is a charade and why blacks continue to believe that voting Democrat will get them the help they need.

Class and race are inseparable in America. It is impossible to talk about class in America without talking about the fact that the preponderance of black people in this country are disproportionately poor. It is also impossible to talk about what happened in New Orleans without some white conservatives focusing on the crime, instead of focusing on the vast majority of poor black Americans who were law abiding, who were frightened themselves.-Woman

Of course the preponderance of black people in this country are disproportionately poor. Because the preponderance of black people VOTE DEMOCRAT. *Move to face the audience and give a sweep of the hand* If you people are happy with your bread and circuses, just continue with the sham elections of Democrats, keep voting for the fake Democrats and the fake liberals.

Then is it not wrong for the President to issue an ultimatum that there was zero tolerance and thereby encourage his right wing flacks in the liberal media that this gives us license to shoot people on sight, as if in the middle of this crisis where so many people are dying already what we need to do is to shoot Tyrone because he is getting out of Circuit City with some soddy twiddlers.-Bill Mayer

Bush did not give the order to shoot looters on sight in Baghdad. He was charged with demonism and lack of compassion for letting the looting get out of control. His “right wing flacks” learned from this, from you, and anybody that dies from being shot is on your hands. Or did you think you could destroy Iraq’s civilization and not have the same thing happen on your own backyard? How is it wrong for the President to order law and order to be maintained in New Orleans after the black and Democrat owners in charge had disarmed the population and ordered a sack of the city by criminals and out of control maniacs?

Smiley shirts, Carlin boyo? Or hope and change. But you died before you got around to aiming your crap cannon at the right administration. You were perfectly right that you had no skin in the game. That was up to people who will actually suffer from your actions. *Mutters Blowhard Leftist rich liberal tea sippers sitting at the top lording it over the rest of us*

Bill Mayer: Fascism is where corporations become the government.

Carlin: Yes.

Me: (or the government becomes and owns the corporations)

The owners of this nation are rich and will continue to get richer when Democrats raise taxes so that rich people pay for the entire federal budget of the United States government, not to mention all those bribes to the corporations paid by Democrats and the Obama administration. If you want to see this country owned by bread and circuses given out by the rich and the corporations? Keep raising taxes so they will own all of you house slaves sooner or later. Just keep voting Democrat.

Mayer: It is not that looting is good, we all know that looting is bad, it is the priorities. It is the fact that white people obsess on one black guy getting away with a crime once, when it has worked in reverse a billion times more, the same as they are obsessing over a few people getting away in the middle of this much bigger crisis. It is a matter of what is proportional.

Woman: There were so many rumours. Rapes of small children.

There are so many rumours of US military atrocities as well, but do you think you can cheer those on and show your face here, to the American people, and say those rumours are true and then come back and say that when the Leftist media gives your people the same treatment, it is suddenly a large problem? Bullshit.

Woman: Much of what you believe happened, didn’t happen. But once you see, once many white people see a few, a Very Few Black Men who are lawless, then the entire country is under attack.

Much of what blacks and rich whites thought happened in Iraq under Bush didn’t happen. Once you believe one miscarriage of justice exists when the defendant is white, as in the Duke racial hatred case, you see a Billion other miscarriages of justice. Once you see one lawless military member in Iraq, suddenly the entire United States military, Bush, his Betrayus Generals, and Rumsfeld, now must be held to account. Don’t you think giving a pass to your high and mighty owners like Nagin, OJ, looters ordered to loot by the government of New Orleans, will motivate people to hold the real criminals, Bush and his gang, responsible when you wish to suddenly direct the mob’s fury? Do you think, like Carlin here, that you have no stake, no skin, in the game when this country is disrupted and undermined by your philosophy? What a dream that will soon turn to the nightmare of ages.

Glassman: I agree with you on that one. The education system in New Orleans is atrocious. The public housing system horrifying.

Glassman, you are an idiot. A well intentioned idiot, yes, perhaps even a good idiot, but still an idiot. You are an idiot precisely because you are not ignorant. You are not ignorant of Leftist ideas. Hell, they shoved your damn face in it. But you are still caught off guard. You still act surprised. You still act emotional as if you were angry at the unjust things they were saying but you couldn’t explain why. That is excusable on the part of a neophyte mugged by Leftists after 9/11, somebody new to politics and to the history of the Left and their Democrat party accessories. But it is not excusable for someone like you, someone who knows, who knows these Leftist dupes and those with malice forethought (Carlin), and has heard their views, face to face, air to air, word to word. You have no excuse for your lack of preparedness, no excuse, and no time. No time at all, with the election of Obama. You could have tied up the strings, at least made the motherpocking attempt to throw the anger of the mob on where it should have gone, Nagin and the Democrat system of lawful slavery, but you didn’t. You crapped out and the entire country went with you.

I honor and respect your heart, but it ain’t the heart that’s going to win the fauking Sunnis over to our cause. It is cold, hard steel, bombs, and political machinations that will. Machiavelli to the fifth power magnitude. To win the Democrat shills and dupes and craptards over, we will need even more than what won the Sunnis over in the end. And you, sir, have not the wisdom nor the brilliance of a Petraeus, he who they called a traitor to this nation. He who, because you were unable and unwilling to defend him, will no longer be able to defend you from your own government.

I hate sociopaths. But I hate Leftist fucktards on Mayer’s show even more, cause they know better, but choose not to. Sociopaths know better but don’t care, but Leftists care, at least some of the fake liberals in the Democrat party pretends to. Ignorant shills as they are. But sociopaths can be killed, which erases the hate, until I see another one. Democrats can’t be killed, assassinated, and not even character assassinated like they did to Palin, cause the Right, the decent majority, won’t stand for my methods. I understand that. So guess what happens. Now I’m unto you, the talking heads and public relation diaster fauk ups for the Republican party and the conservative movement.

You, and you are typical of the breed, have no idea what the fauk you are dealing with here. You are dealing with mob mentalities so ancient you might as well read the ancient fracking records of the Athenians hauling victorious generals unto the street and beating their brains out. THAT for fauking democracy and the will of the people. This shit has been going on for so long as mankind learned how to use fire, and how to burn a man, woman, and child alive with it. This manipulation of the masses have been going on since the Athenian assemply, all 4 freaking hundred of em, ordered Socrates to drink poison, Socrates the greatest educator of their age, because they disliked, mother fucking disliked, how he was a mentor to one of the Spartan warlords currently in charge of the city. It was not the Spartans that took out and executed Athen’s greatest teacher, it was the Athenians themselves. And I assure you, that assembly cum mob, didn’t do so on their own. They had leaders. People who instigated. Leftist intellectuals in an older skin. Don’t forget. Never forget history or the crimes they have done unto our people.

That is what you are dealing with here, Glassman. Your pretentious, and yes that is how they see it, notions of “fair play’ and “equal justice” are worth fauk all to the Left. Until you recognize this, accept this in your heart of heart’s and drill it into your damn soul and brain, you are nothing but a hinderance to the rest of us suffering under the yoke of Leftist totalitarianism. Because while you act all “reasonable”, they are doing the real work of destroying everything I care about and perhaps everything you care about. You remain certain in your knowledge and belief that America and the Constitution will take care of things for you, that things won’t get bad enough for another Civil War. But aren’t you the one that told the New Orleans shills that they shouldn’t be begging for help from Bush, but rather they should get off their arse and help themselves or at least demand their local Democrat dupes help them directly? Oh wait, you didn’t, my bad. You just talked about looting and law and order, as if the people who executed Socrates cared at all that Socrates refused a prison breakout by Plato because Socrates believed that a man must obey the rule of law, especially when it disfavors him, or else anarchy will develop. Plato learned much from the example made of Socrates, and America is the direct product of his thoughts and wisdom on this score.

You have blinded yourself. You think America is great, and she is, and that simply because of this, the inequalities in the black community will naturally balance out so long as capitalism and honest American virtues are given a time to work. Well, guess what, all you armchair media heads forget one thing: No Plan Survives Contact With The Enemy. You forgot to include the Enemy, the Left, in your calculations of American exceptionalism. A mortal mistake. But you are mortal, so that may be excused on the basis of human fallibility.

Don’t kid yourself or me. It will not balance itself. So long as the Democrats remain undefeated, so long as what was done to the Nazis and to AL Qaeda in Afghanistan and Iraq is not meted out to the Dems. So long as counter-insurgency, COIN if you will, is not utilized…. The Democrats will keep resurging like the Soviet sex trade and the Soviet dehumanization of human beings, in the guise of Putin and if not him, somebody else. Such a simplistic and concise terminology: COIN. It is much more subtle than “war”, much more subtle than “revolution”, and much more subtle than social inequality “transformations” and “redistribution of wealth”. Because in the end, warfare is based upon insurgency and counter-insurgencies, for warfare requires logistics above all else and logistics are based upon humans and humans are directly the targets of insurgency or counter-insurgency. And thus COIN? It contains all of the above.

["It's Called the American Dream Because You Have To Be Asleep to Believe It" Link] [Courtesy]

It would have been nice to see how the Left would have destroyed Carlin when Carlin started in on Obama. Amusement and entertainment, if nothing else. But Carlin crapped out on this before then, some months before the election in 2008.

It would also have been interesting if the Owner, Carlin, had his dream (discussed in the interview with the View) taken away from him for the good of the “masses”. All of Carlin’s wealth, that somehow magically appeared and was not the result of the “American Dream” he says you have to be unconscious to believe in, taken away from him. That would have been poetic justice.

THe only way to teach hypocrites the lesson of their folly is to smash their faces in the iniquity of their own pretensions. But once dead, they are out of our reach for all time. They are also out of our way for all time. That removes most of the fun, and most of the point in it too. They are free from justice, after a lifetime of committing injustice upon the American body politic. Leading people to cynicism and not even getting the target correct.

Creativity through drugs and getting out of drugs by “having something to live for”. But he would strip that reason for life out of other people’s lives, because he doesn’t need religion so that must mean nobody does. Hubris, arrogance, rich white boys thinking they can tell me what to do. Hypocrisy. A fauking drug addict, worth millions, got his dream, lived it by doing what he liked and loved and created what he wished after some hard work, telling the rest of us the American Dream is a fake, is dead, is only believed in by the unconscious. This piece of slime thinks he has the balls to tell me what is true or not? That the government is the one that doesn’t want people educated to become able to critically think for themselves? But it is not the government alone in that respect, for Carlin’s audience is the same way, isn’t it.


Look at the time mark 6:00. George Carlin is talking about the extinction of the human species via viruses. This is what he dreams of and what his “Greater Wisdom” means. The death of humanity. He is a nihilist and his goals are no different, were no different, than the environmentalists he sought to “lambast”. Well, George, you got one wish, nature offed you and it was by cause of no human (human medicine did much to save your retarded life and keep you healthy for more years than you would have had in Cuba).

In case people haven’t noticed by now, what I feel is called hate. And it is the emotion the Democrats have been cooking up for generations. But hate can’t be controlled. It consumes and I know it very well. If you fan the flames and keep it going, eventually it will get out of control, for not all people have my philosophy on self-control and self-discipline. They can’t control their hate, they can’t control it because they let it burn: burn themselves, burn others. That is what hate wants. It wants to hurt people, it wants to hurt people like Carlin because it believes they need to be hurt, and it doesn’t matter whether it is their family, their business or their life, or even whether it is their inheritance left over from death. I understand hate, how to use it, how to control it, how to witness its use, how to recognize when others are stoking it up and manipulating it, perhaps better than most. But I do not understand it perfectly. Can never understand it perfectly. But I know it better than George Carlin, that woman on Mayer’s show, or Glassman. They have too much. Too much education. Too much class. Too much wit or smarts or money or something. They don’t understand that inner burning desire, not as I do, not as those at the bottom do. It is their gift and curse, just as it is mine. The difference, you may notice, is that they curse their gift and blame the effects of the curse on people richer than they and living just as good, if not better lives, such as Rush Limbaugh or George W. Bush or Sarah Palin. I, on the other hand, harbor no ill intent towards those who have more than I do. That is, up until I see that they are fucking people weaker than they are and unable to defend themselves.

P.S.

I apologize for the long absence to my readers. I was kind of in a tunnel vision: studying, researching, contemplating, holding my contempt in, being diverted by some RL activities, etc.

FLICKR Photos February 1, 2009

Posted by ymarsakar in Beauty.
2 comments

Nice picture: Taya. Nice hair and facial structure.

Another one.

Third one.

Obama Hypocrisy January 31, 2009

Posted by ymarsakar in Politics.
add a comment

A nice overview of how politics work with the Dems.

Middle East Studies: Contributions to War January 28, 2009

Posted by ymarsakar in Corruption, Culture.
add a comment

A particularly fascinating look at the inside of academic turf wars. And the consequences won’t be just who is head of what or how much one’s department is funded.

There is an organization for orthodox scholars of the Middle East — that is, for leftist and politicized ones. It is called the Middle East Studies Association, or MESA. It is led by such men as Rashid Khalidi, the FOB (Friend of Barack) and occupant of Columbia University’s Edward Said chair. You also may have heard of Juan Cole, of the University of Michigan; and of Georgetown’s John Esposito. Men like this are the face of today’s Middle East studies. To say it as briefly as possible: Arafat would consider himself lucky — and probably did.

The late Said is the father of this MESA crowd, or at least an influential big brother. So much has been written about him, I will not add a word here. But I’ll give Paul Johnson one. In September 2006, he was contemplating a book to be called “Monsters.” And he wrote that he would include Said, “this malevolent liar and propagandist, who has been responsible for more harm than any other intellectual of his generation.”

Before 9/11, MESA was pretty much a joke, a Marxoid playground whose significance to the larger world was slight. It was hard to get a decent Middle Eastern education in the United States, but that was okay: We all have to make sacrifices. After 9/11, however, the joke was not so funny. There was a real need for soundness on the Middle East. You couldn’t just say, “Israel evil. America evil. Palestinians good. Hamas, Hezbollah, and mullahs misunderstood. Colonialism bad — left enduring scars. West bad. Terrorists driven to their acts by oppression. Arabs must unite, eschew factions — created by a scheming West — and win.”

No, that falderal was suddenly intolerable. As the Iraqi-American scholar Nibras Kazimi put it, “America and the world cannot afford to lounge around in the blissful lethargy of intellectual shallowness now that the jihadists of the Middle East . . . have declared their war and delivered their bomb-laden calling cards.”

Link